Management of adhesive small bowel obstruction during pregnancy in the United States.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Matthew J Ashbrook, Vincent Cheng, Emma Longo, Nathan Kohrman, Koji Matsuo, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Kazuhide Matsushima
{"title":"Management of adhesive small bowel obstruction during pregnancy in the United States.","authors":"Matthew J Ashbrook, Vincent Cheng, Emma Longo, Nathan Kohrman, Koji Matsuo, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba, Kazuhide Matsushima","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a rare, nonobstetrical abdominal emergency. Optimal management of ASBO during pregnancy remains unknown. This study analyzes management trends and outcomes of pregnant patients with ASBO in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample was queried for pregnant women diagnosed with ASBO from January 2003 to September 2015. Patients were grouped into three management strategies: nonoperative management (NOM), immediate operation (from admission to hospital day 1), or delayed operation (after hospital day 1). Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between management strategies and maternal or perinatal complications. The impact of delayed operation on patient outcomes was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,266 pregnant patients with ASBO were identified: 1,974 (46.3%) were managed nonoperatively, 1,177 (27.6%) underwent immediate operation, and 1,115 (26.1%) underwent delayed operation. The rate of NOM did not significantly change over the study period. Compared with NOM, immediate operation was not associated with increased complication rates, whereas delayed operation was associated with higher rates of maternal septic shock (odds ratio [OR], 5.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-29.21; p = 0.04) and preterm labor, delivery, or abortion (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.56-3.72; p < 0.001). In analysis of patients who underwent surgery, each day of delay in operation was associated with a 14% higher chance of preterm labor, delivery, or abortion (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnant patients presenting with ASBO were often managed operatively. Delay to operation was associated with increased odd of maternal and perinatal complications. Surgeons should be involved early in determining the optimal management for ASBO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"915-920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a rare, nonobstetrical abdominal emergency. Optimal management of ASBO during pregnancy remains unknown. This study analyzes management trends and outcomes of pregnant patients with ASBO in the United States.

Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for pregnant women diagnosed with ASBO from January 2003 to September 2015. Patients were grouped into three management strategies: nonoperative management (NOM), immediate operation (from admission to hospital day 1), or delayed operation (after hospital day 1). Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between management strategies and maternal or perinatal complications. The impact of delayed operation on patient outcomes was also assessed.

Results: A total of 4,266 pregnant patients with ASBO were identified: 1,974 (46.3%) were managed nonoperatively, 1,177 (27.6%) underwent immediate operation, and 1,115 (26.1%) underwent delayed operation. The rate of NOM did not significantly change over the study period. Compared with NOM, immediate operation was not associated with increased complication rates, whereas delayed operation was associated with higher rates of maternal septic shock (odds ratio [OR], 5.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-29.21; p = 0.04) and preterm labor, delivery, or abortion (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.56-3.72; p < 0.001). In analysis of patients who underwent surgery, each day of delay in operation was associated with a 14% higher chance of preterm labor, delivery, or abortion (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Pregnant patients presenting with ASBO were often managed operatively. Delay to operation was associated with increased odd of maternal and perinatal complications. Surgeons should be involved early in determining the optimal management for ASBO.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

美国妊娠期粘连性小肠梗阻的处理。
背景:粘连性小肠梗阻(ASBO)是一种罕见的非产科腹部急症。妊娠期反社会行为的最佳管理尚不清楚。本研究分析了美国妊娠ASBO患者的管理趋势和结果。方法:对2003年1月至2015年9月诊断为ASBO的孕妇进行全国住院抽样调查。将患者分为三种处理策略:非手术处理(NOM)、立即手术(入院第1天)或延迟手术(住院第1天)。采用多变量回归分析评估处理策略与孕产妇或围产期并发症之间的关系。延迟手术对患者预后的影响也进行了评估。结果:共发现4266例ASBO孕妇,其中非手术处理1974例(46.3%),立即手术1177例(27.6%),延迟手术1115例(26.1%)。在研究期间,NOM的发生率没有显著变化。与NOM相比,立即手术与并发症发生率增加无关,而延迟手术与产妇感染性休克发生率升高相关(优势比[OR], 5.63;95%置信区间[CI], 1.09-29.21;p = 0.04)和早产、分娩或流产(or, 2.41;95% ci, 1.56-3.72;P < 0.001)。在对接受手术的患者的分析中,手术每延迟一天,早产、分娩或流产的几率增加14% (or, 1.14;95% ci, 1.08-1.21;P < 0.001)。结论:妊娠期ASBO患者通常采用手术治疗。延迟手术与产妇和围产期并发症的发生率增加有关。外科医生应尽早参与确定ASBO的最佳治疗方法。证据水平:治疗/护理管理;IV级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信