Jacquelyn Pendergast, Jolie B Wormwood, Kelly Stolzmann, Amy K Rosen, Katie Fitzgerald Jones, Christopher J Miller, Michael Still, Barbara Bokhour, Joseph T Hanlon, Steven R Simon, Amy M Linsky
{"title":"Engaging Patients in Discussions About Medication Deprescribing.","authors":"Jacquelyn Pendergast, Jolie B Wormwood, Kelly Stolzmann, Amy K Rosen, Katie Fitzgerald Jones, Christopher J Miller, Michael Still, Barbara Bokhour, Joseph T Hanlon, Steven R Simon, Amy M Linsky","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09346-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deprescribing, intentional medication discontinuation or dose reduction, can reduce potentially inappropriate medication use and medication-related harms. Engaging patients in deprescribing discussions may increase likelihood of deprescribing and promote shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of patient-directed educational brochures on patient engagement and deprescribing discussions with primary care providers (PCPs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We mailed medication-specific brochures 2 weeks prior to each patient's PCP appointment (4/12/2021-10/7/2022), followed by a mailed survey 2 weeks after scheduled PCP visits.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients from three Veterans Affairs facilities with scheduled PCP appointments eligible for one of three medication-based cohorts (proton pump inhibitor, gabapentin, diabetes-hypoglycemia risk).</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Our primary outcome was patient-reported deprescribing discussions with their PCP (yes/no). Descriptive statistics characterized engagement with and reactions to the brochure. Multivariable logistic regression models determined associations of patient characteristics, attitudes, and brochure-engagement with reported deprescribing discussions.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Adjusting only for patient characteristics, discussions were less likely if respondents were Black (vs. White: OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.78) and more likely with higher education level (e.g., advanced degree vs. high school or less: OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.53-3.73), and adequate health literacy (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.92). After further adjusting for general deprescribing attitudes and brochure engagement, discussions were more likely if respondents completed brochure activities (vs. did not read brochures: OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.59), contacted their PCPs prior to their visits (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.34, 4.58), or discussed the brochure with family/friends (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22-2.41) or a healthcare provider (OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.08-4.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient characteristics and brochure engagement were associated with deprescribing discussions. Patient-centered deprescribing brochures can foster patient engagement and inclusion of patient perspectives into deprescribing decisions. Future studies should explore implementation strategies that promote greater deprescribing reach and adoption among patients with lower health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1811-1819"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09346-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deprescribing, intentional medication discontinuation or dose reduction, can reduce potentially inappropriate medication use and medication-related harms. Engaging patients in deprescribing discussions may increase likelihood of deprescribing and promote shared decision-making.
Objective: To examine the impact of patient-directed educational brochures on patient engagement and deprescribing discussions with primary care providers (PCPs).
Design: We mailed medication-specific brochures 2 weeks prior to each patient's PCP appointment (4/12/2021-10/7/2022), followed by a mailed survey 2 weeks after scheduled PCP visits.
Participants: Patients from three Veterans Affairs facilities with scheduled PCP appointments eligible for one of three medication-based cohorts (proton pump inhibitor, gabapentin, diabetes-hypoglycemia risk).
Main measures: Our primary outcome was patient-reported deprescribing discussions with their PCP (yes/no). Descriptive statistics characterized engagement with and reactions to the brochure. Multivariable logistic regression models determined associations of patient characteristics, attitudes, and brochure-engagement with reported deprescribing discussions.
Key results: Adjusting only for patient characteristics, discussions were less likely if respondents were Black (vs. White: OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.78) and more likely with higher education level (e.g., advanced degree vs. high school or less: OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.53-3.73), and adequate health literacy (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.92). After further adjusting for general deprescribing attitudes and brochure engagement, discussions were more likely if respondents completed brochure activities (vs. did not read brochures: OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.59), contacted their PCPs prior to their visits (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.34, 4.58), or discussed the brochure with family/friends (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22-2.41) or a healthcare provider (OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.08-4.85).
Conclusions: Patient characteristics and brochure engagement were associated with deprescribing discussions. Patient-centered deprescribing brochures can foster patient engagement and inclusion of patient perspectives into deprescribing decisions. Future studies should explore implementation strategies that promote greater deprescribing reach and adoption among patients with lower health literacy.
背景:开处方、故意停药或减少剂量可以减少潜在的不适当用药和药物相关危害。让患者参与开处方的讨论可能会增加开处方的可能性,并促进共同决策。目的:研究以患者为导向的教育手册对患者参与和与初级保健提供者(pcp)讨论处方的影响。设计:我们在每位患者预约PCP前2周(2021年4月12日- 2022年10月7日)邮寄特定药物的小册子,然后在预定的PCP就诊后2周邮寄调查。参与者:来自三家退伍军人事务机构的患者,有PCP预约,符合三个基于药物的队列之一(质子泵抑制剂,加巴喷丁,糖尿病-低血糖风险)。主要指标:我们的主要结果是患者报告的与PCP的处方讨论(是/否)。描述性统计描述了对小册子的参与和反应。多变量逻辑回归模型确定了患者特征、态度和手册参与与报告的处方讨论的关联。关键结果:仅根据患者特征进行调整,如果受访者是黑人(相对于白人:OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.78),讨论的可能性较小,而更有可能是高等教育水平(例如,高等学位相对于高中或以下:OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.53-3.73)和足够的健康素养(OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.16-2.92)。在进一步调整了一般的描述态度和宣传册参与度后,如果受访者完成了宣传册活动(相对于没有阅读宣传册:OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.59),在访问前联系了他们的pcp (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.34, 4.58),或者与家人/朋友(OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.22-2.41)或医疗保健提供者(OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.08-4.85)讨论宣传册,讨论的可能性更大。结论:患者特征和手册参与与处方讨论相关。以患者为中心的处方手册可以促进患者的参与,并将患者的观点纳入处方决策。未来的研究应探索实施策略,以促进更大的处方覆盖范围和低健康素养患者的采用。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.