Use of digital facilitation to support the use of digital services in general practice in England: An interview study with key stakeholders.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Bethan Mair Treadgold, Rachel Winder, Helen Atherton, Carol Bryce, John Campbell, Christine Marriott, Jenny Newbould, Stephanie Stockwell, Emma Pitchforth
{"title":"Use of digital facilitation to support the use of digital services in general practice in England: An interview study with key stakeholders.","authors":"Bethan Mair Treadgold, Rachel Winder, Helen Atherton, Carol Bryce, John Campbell, Christine Marriott, Jenny Newbould, Stephanie Stockwell, Emma Pitchforth","doi":"10.1177/13558196251316446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital services in primary care are becoming more common, yet access to and use of services can create inequities. Our aim was to explore the drivers, priorities, and evolving policy context influencing digital facilitation in primary care as reported by national, regional and local level stakeholders in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted online semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders, including those in NHS England organisations, local commissioners for health care, statutory and third sector organisations, those working within the research community, and digital platform providers. Interviews were analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of stakeholders worked in national level roles, in commissioning or statutory and third sector organisations working in relation to digital inclusion and patient access. Demographic inequalities, poor usability of digital primary care services, and low digital skills were perceived to comprise some of the barriers facing patients in accessing and using digital primary care services. Demand pressures in general practice, inconsistent training opportunities in digital services for staff, and conflicting perceptions around who should be responsible in organising digital facilitation were reported as barriers in the organisation and provision of digital facilitation in primary care. Stakeholders shared future visions for digital primary care and recommended focusing on establishing the concept of digital facilitation and promoting the benefits in its adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy that is specific to digital facilitation and not just to digital services is required to establish clear lines of responsibility, investment in staff time and training, and the development of digital services that work well for various groups of patients and practice staff. A multi-organisational working team involving decision-makers and those working on the ground in general practice is encouraged to establish principles for supporting patients and staff in accessing and using digital primary care services in the NHS in England.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196251316446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251316446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Digital services in primary care are becoming more common, yet access to and use of services can create inequities. Our aim was to explore the drivers, priorities, and evolving policy context influencing digital facilitation in primary care as reported by national, regional and local level stakeholders in England.

Methods: We conducted online semi-structured qualitative interviews with stakeholders, including those in NHS England organisations, local commissioners for health care, statutory and third sector organisations, those working within the research community, and digital platform providers. Interviews were analysed using a thematic approach.

Results: The majority of stakeholders worked in national level roles, in commissioning or statutory and third sector organisations working in relation to digital inclusion and patient access. Demographic inequalities, poor usability of digital primary care services, and low digital skills were perceived to comprise some of the barriers facing patients in accessing and using digital primary care services. Demand pressures in general practice, inconsistent training opportunities in digital services for staff, and conflicting perceptions around who should be responsible in organising digital facilitation were reported as barriers in the organisation and provision of digital facilitation in primary care. Stakeholders shared future visions for digital primary care and recommended focusing on establishing the concept of digital facilitation and promoting the benefits in its adoption.

Conclusions: Policy that is specific to digital facilitation and not just to digital services is required to establish clear lines of responsibility, investment in staff time and training, and the development of digital services that work well for various groups of patients and practice staff. A multi-organisational working team involving decision-makers and those working on the ground in general practice is encouraged to establish principles for supporting patients and staff in accessing and using digital primary care services in the NHS in England.

使用数字便利来支持在英国一般实践中使用数字服务:对主要利益相关者的访谈研究。
目标:初级保健中的数字服务正变得越来越普遍,但服务的获取和使用可能会造成不平等。我们的目的是探索英国国家、地区和地方利益相关者报告的影响初级保健数字化便利化的驱动因素、优先事项和不断发展的政策背景。方法:我们对利益相关者进行了在线半结构化定性访谈,包括NHS英格兰组织、当地卫生保健专员、法定和第三部门组织、研究社区工作人员和数字平台提供商。访谈采用专题方法进行分析。结果:大多数利益相关者在国家层面的角色中工作,在与数字包容和患者获取相关的委托或法定和第三部门组织中工作。据认为,人口不平等、数字初级保健服务可用性差以及数字技能低是患者在获取和使用数字初级保健服务方面面临的一些障碍。据报告,全科实践中的需求压力、员工在数字服务方面的培训机会不一致,以及关于谁应该负责组织数字便利的相互矛盾的看法,都是初级保健中组织和提供数字便利的障碍。利益攸关方分享了数字化初级保健的未来愿景,并建议重点确立数字化便利化的概念,并促进其采用所带来的好处。结论:需要制定专门针对数字促进而不仅仅是数字服务的政策,以建立明确的责任界限,对员工时间和培训进行投资,并开发适用于各种患者群体和执业人员的数字服务。鼓励一个包括决策者和全科医生在内的多组织工作小组建立原则,支持患者和工作人员访问和使用英格兰NHS的数字初级保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信