Therapeutic Focus on Strengths is Associated with Improved Functioning and Higher Clinical Progress in Children's Public Mental Health Care.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Community Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s10597-024-01445-6
Emilee H Turner, Charles W Mueller
{"title":"Therapeutic Focus on Strengths is Associated with Improved Functioning and Higher Clinical Progress in Children's Public Mental Health Care.","authors":"Emilee H Turner, Charles W Mueller","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01445-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior findings suggest a greater therapeutic focus on strengths is associated with a higher likelihood of successful treatment discharge in youth public mental health treatment. To build upon previous research, the present study examined whether and to what extent therapeutic focus on strengths was associated with changes in day-to-day functioning and treatment progress over the course of therapy. This study used multilevel modeling techniques to analyze 12 consecutive years of standardized routine clinical service data from a public mental health care system which served youth and families who were typically from underserved and low-income backgrounds. The sample comprised 2362 youth with an average age of 13.51 (2.9 SD) years receiving at least 3 months of standards-based intensive in-home (SB-IIH) treatment services. Most youth in the sample identified as multi-ethnic (62.5%) and male (61%). Therapeutic focus on strengths was measured as a proportion of overall treatment targets endorsed by therapists. A greater focus on strengths during the first 5 months of SB-IIH services was a significant predictor of improved functioning at the end of treatment and higher average monthly scores on a measure of treatment progress even after accounting for other predictors, including level of impairment at treatment start. Practice-based findings suggest a greater focus on strengths in youth treatment services might be beneficial in improving functioning and treatment progress. Study findings highlight the need for further research in other clinical youth samples. Clinical practice, dissemination, implementation, and future research implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1047-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01445-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior findings suggest a greater therapeutic focus on strengths is associated with a higher likelihood of successful treatment discharge in youth public mental health treatment. To build upon previous research, the present study examined whether and to what extent therapeutic focus on strengths was associated with changes in day-to-day functioning and treatment progress over the course of therapy. This study used multilevel modeling techniques to analyze 12 consecutive years of standardized routine clinical service data from a public mental health care system which served youth and families who were typically from underserved and low-income backgrounds. The sample comprised 2362 youth with an average age of 13.51 (2.9 SD) years receiving at least 3 months of standards-based intensive in-home (SB-IIH) treatment services. Most youth in the sample identified as multi-ethnic (62.5%) and male (61%). Therapeutic focus on strengths was measured as a proportion of overall treatment targets endorsed by therapists. A greater focus on strengths during the first 5 months of SB-IIH services was a significant predictor of improved functioning at the end of treatment and higher average monthly scores on a measure of treatment progress even after accounting for other predictors, including level of impairment at treatment start. Practice-based findings suggest a greater focus on strengths in youth treatment services might be beneficial in improving functioning and treatment progress. Study findings highlight the need for further research in other clinical youth samples. Clinical practice, dissemination, implementation, and future research implications are discussed.

儿童公共心理卫生保健的治疗重点与功能改善和更高的临床进展有关。
先前的研究结果表明,在青少年公共心理健康治疗中,更注重优势的治疗与成功出院的可能性更高有关。在先前研究的基础上,本研究考察了治疗对优势的关注是否以及在多大程度上与治疗过程中日常功能和治疗进展的变化有关。本研究使用多层次建模技术来分析来自公共精神卫生保健系统连续12年的标准化常规临床服务数据,该系统为通常来自服务不足和低收入背景的青少年和家庭提供服务。样本包括2362名平均年龄为13.51 (2.9 SD)岁的青少年,接受至少3个月的基于标准的强化家庭(SB-IIH)治疗服务。样本中的大多数青年被确定为多民族(62.5%)和男性(61%)。治疗对优势的关注被衡量为治疗师认可的整体治疗目标的比例。更关注SB-IIH服务的前5个月的优势是治疗结束时功能改善的重要预测因素,即使在考虑了其他预测因素(包括治疗开始时的损伤水平)后,治疗进展的平均月评分也更高。基于实践的研究结果表明,更多地关注青年治疗服务的优势可能有利于改善功能和治疗进展。研究结果强调了对其他临床青年样本进行进一步研究的必要性。讨论了临床实践、传播、实施和未来的研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信