Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilisation treatment: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Daimin Wei, Yun Sun, Han Zhao, Junhao Yan, Hong Zhou, Fei Gong, Aijun Zhang, Ze Wang, Lei Jin, Hongchu Bao, Shuyun Zhao, Zhuoni Xiao, Yingying Qin, Ling Geng, Linlin Cui, Yan Sheng, Mei Sun, Peihao Liu, Lingling Ding, Hong Liu, Keliang Wu, Yan Li, Yao Lu, Bufang Xu, Bei Xu, Luqing Zhang, Heping Zhang, Richard S Legro, Zi-Jiang Chen
{"title":"Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilisation treatment: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Daimin Wei, Yun Sun, Han Zhao, Junhao Yan, Hong Zhou, Fei Gong, Aijun Zhang, Ze Wang, Lei Jin, Hongchu Bao, Shuyun Zhao, Zhuoni Xiao, Yingying Qin, Ling Geng, Linlin Cui, Yan Sheng, Mei Sun, Peihao Liu, Lingling Ding, Hong Liu, Keliang Wu, Yan Li, Yao Lu, Bufang Xu, Bei Xu, Luqing Zhang, Heping Zhang, Richard S Legro, Zi-Jiang Chen","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-081474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the hypothesis that a freeze-all strategy would increase the chance of live birth compared with fresh embryo transfer in women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nine academic fertility centres in China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>838 women with a low prognosis for IVF treatment defined by ≤9 oocytes retrieved or poor ovarian reserve (antral follicle count <5 or serum anti-Müllerian hormone level <8.6 pmol/L).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Eligible participants were randomised (1:1) to undergo either frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer on the day of oocyte retrieval. Participants in the frozen embryo transfer group had all of their embryos cryopreserved and underwent frozen embryo transfer later. Participants in the fresh embryo transfer group underwent fresh embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was live birth, defined as the delivery of neonates with a heartbeat and respiration at ≥28 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, singleton or twin pregnancy, pregnancy loss, ectopic pregnancy, birth weight, maternal and neonatal complications, and cumulative live birth after embryo transfers within one year after randomisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of live birth was lower in the frozen embryo transfer group than in the fresh embryo transfer group (32% (132 of 419) <i>v</i> 40% (168 of 419); relative ratio 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.94); P=0.009). The frozen embryo group had a lower rate of clinical pregnancy than the fresh embryo group (39% (164 of 419) <i>v</i> 47% (197 of 419); 0.83 (0.71 to 0.97)). The cumulative live birth rate was lower in the frozen embryo transfer group compared with the fresh embryo transfer group (44% (185 of 419) <i>v</i> 51% (215 of 419), 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99)). No difference was observed in birth weight, incidence of obstetric complications, or risk of neonatal morbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fresh embryo transfer may be a better choice for women with low prognosis in terms of live birth rate compared with a freeze-all strategy. The treatment strategies that prevent fresh embryo transfers, such as accumulating embryos with back-to-back cycles or performing routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, warrant further studies in women with a low prognosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100050168.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":"388 ","pages":"e081474"},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11778674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that a freeze-all strategy would increase the chance of live birth compared with fresh embryo transfer in women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment.

Design: Pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Nine academic fertility centres in China.

Participants: 838 women with a low prognosis for IVF treatment defined by ≤9 oocytes retrieved or poor ovarian reserve (antral follicle count <5 or serum anti-Müllerian hormone level <8.6 pmol/L).

Interventions: Eligible participants were randomised (1:1) to undergo either frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer on the day of oocyte retrieval. Participants in the frozen embryo transfer group had all of their embryos cryopreserved and underwent frozen embryo transfer later. Participants in the fresh embryo transfer group underwent fresh embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was live birth, defined as the delivery of neonates with a heartbeat and respiration at ≥28 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, singleton or twin pregnancy, pregnancy loss, ectopic pregnancy, birth weight, maternal and neonatal complications, and cumulative live birth after embryo transfers within one year after randomisation.

Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of live birth was lower in the frozen embryo transfer group than in the fresh embryo transfer group (32% (132 of 419) v 40% (168 of 419); relative ratio 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.94); P=0.009). The frozen embryo group had a lower rate of clinical pregnancy than the fresh embryo group (39% (164 of 419) v 47% (197 of 419); 0.83 (0.71 to 0.97)). The cumulative live birth rate was lower in the frozen embryo transfer group compared with the fresh embryo transfer group (44% (185 of 419) v 51% (215 of 419), 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99)). No difference was observed in birth weight, incidence of obstetric complications, or risk of neonatal morbidities.

Conclusions: Fresh embryo transfer may be a better choice for women with low prognosis in terms of live birth rate compared with a freeze-all strategy. The treatment strategies that prevent fresh embryo transfers, such as accumulating embryos with back-to-back cycles or performing routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, warrant further studies in women with a low prognosis.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100050168.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信