Impact of introducing transnasal endoscopy on expanding diagnostic endoscopy services.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ben Thomas Crosby, Laura Munglani, Karen Wright, Kay Charles, Wendy Evans, Megan Mathias, Stevie Davies, Badr Abdalla, Jeff Turner, Tom Crosby, Nigel Trudgill, Hasan Haboubi
{"title":"Impact of introducing transnasal endoscopy on expanding diagnostic endoscopy services.","authors":"Ben Thomas Crosby, Laura Munglani, Karen Wright, Kay Charles, Wendy Evans, Megan Mathias, Stevie Davies, Badr Abdalla, Jeff Turner, Tom Crosby, Nigel Trudgill, Hasan Haboubi","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Demand for endoscopic services is outstripping capacity in the UK. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) utilises a narrow calibre endoscope to pass through the nasal passages, thereby reducing retching and discomfort. It is better tolerated compared with standard transoral endoscopy (TOE) but is still rarely used as a diagnostic modality. There is still uncertainty about how well it performs against TOE in diagnostic ability, cost and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored utilising TNE to deal with the growing demand for endoscopy. We compared findings to TOE procedures undertaken during the same time period. We evaluated cost differences, duration/time in the department for procedures as well as quality of procedures (both in terms of performance indicators as well as image quality using the validated POLPREP score).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures were evaluated (100 TNE and 141 matched TOE) between December 2021 and February 2022. TNE outperformed TOE in obtaining >95% success rate in nationally approved key performance indicators (retroflexion and duodenal intubation, both p=0.026). It also was associated with better image quality in the oesophagus with a POLPREP A3 Score (excellent image quality) in 36/98 available images compared with 26/136 TOE (p=0.028) and was equivalent to TOE in the stomach and duodenum. TNE was identified as having a key role in facilitating complex cases, previously failed via the TOE route with a success rate in 11/12 (91.7%) of such cases. TNE also shows promise in correcting misdiagnoses of short-segment Barrett's oesophagus (39%) compared with TOE (14.8%) (p=0.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TNE is an emerging endoscopic modality, which shows great promise in replacing TOE in most diagnostic circumstances. In a modern healthcare service, TNE is cheaper, better tolerated and outperforms TOE in multiple domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Demand for endoscopic services is outstripping capacity in the UK. Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) utilises a narrow calibre endoscope to pass through the nasal passages, thereby reducing retching and discomfort. It is better tolerated compared with standard transoral endoscopy (TOE) but is still rarely used as a diagnostic modality. There is still uncertainty about how well it performs against TOE in diagnostic ability, cost and efficiency.

Methods: We explored utilising TNE to deal with the growing demand for endoscopy. We compared findings to TOE procedures undertaken during the same time period. We evaluated cost differences, duration/time in the department for procedures as well as quality of procedures (both in terms of performance indicators as well as image quality using the validated POLPREP score).

Results: A total of 241 upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures were evaluated (100 TNE and 141 matched TOE) between December 2021 and February 2022. TNE outperformed TOE in obtaining >95% success rate in nationally approved key performance indicators (retroflexion and duodenal intubation, both p=0.026). It also was associated with better image quality in the oesophagus with a POLPREP A3 Score (excellent image quality) in 36/98 available images compared with 26/136 TOE (p=0.028) and was equivalent to TOE in the stomach and duodenum. TNE was identified as having a key role in facilitating complex cases, previously failed via the TOE route with a success rate in 11/12 (91.7%) of such cases. TNE also shows promise in correcting misdiagnoses of short-segment Barrett's oesophagus (39%) compared with TOE (14.8%) (p=0.087).

Conclusion: TNE is an emerging endoscopic modality, which shows great promise in replacing TOE in most diagnostic circumstances. In a modern healthcare service, TNE is cheaper, better tolerated and outperforms TOE in multiple domains.

引入经鼻内窥镜对扩大内窥镜诊断服务的影响。
简介:内窥镜服务的需求超过了英国的能力。经鼻内窥镜(TNE)利用窄口径内窥镜通过鼻腔通道,从而减少干呕和不适。与标准经口内窥镜(TOE)相比,它的耐受性更好,但仍很少用作诊断方式。在诊断能力、成本和效率方面,它与TOE相比表现如何仍不确定。方法:探讨利用TNE来应对日益增长的内镜检查需求。我们将结果与同一时期进行的TOE手术进行了比较。我们评估了成本差异、部门程序的持续时间/时间以及程序质量(在性能指标和使用经过验证的POLPREP评分的图像质量方面)。结果:在2021年12月至2022年2月期间,共评估了241例上消化道内窥镜手术(100例TNE和141例匹配的TOE)。TNE在国家批准的关键绩效指标(后伸和十二指肠插管,p=0.026)中获得bb0.95%的成功率优于TOE。在36/98张可用图像中,与26/136张TOE (p=0.028)相比,它还与食道的POLPREP A3评分(优秀图像质量)更好的图像质量相关,并且与胃和十二指肠的TOE相当。TNE被确定为在促进复杂病例中起关键作用,以前通过TOE途径失败,成功率为11/12(91.7%)。TNE在纠正短段Barrett食管误诊方面也有希望(39%),而TOE (14.8%) (p=0.087)。结论:TNE是一种新兴的内窥镜检查方式,在大多数诊断情况下取代TOE有很大的希望。在现代医疗保健服务中,TNE更便宜,耐受性更好,并且在多个领域优于TOE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信