Diagnostic prediction model for screening of elevated low-density and non-high-density lipoproteins in young Thai adults between 20 and 40 years of age.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wuttipat Kiratipaisarl, Vithawat Surawattanasakul, Wachiranun Sirikul, Phichayut Phinyo
{"title":"Diagnostic prediction model for screening of elevated low-density and non-high-density lipoproteins in young Thai adults between 20 and 40 years of age.","authors":"Wuttipat Kiratipaisarl, Vithawat Surawattanasakul, Wachiranun Sirikul, Phichayut Phinyo","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels are paramount in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk management. However, 94.4% of Thai young adult are unaware of their condition. A diagnostic prediction model may assist in screening and alleviating underdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Development and internal validation of diagnostic prediction models on elevated LDL-C (≥160 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (≥160 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-centre, tertiary-care hospital annual health examination data from 29 March 2018 to 30 August 2023 was analysed. Two models with 11 predictors from anthropometry and bioimpedance are fitted with multivariable binary logistic regression predicting elevated LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Predictor selection used the backward stepwise elimination. Four performance metrics were quantified: discrimination using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AuROC); calibration by calibration plot; utility by decision curve analysis and instability by performance instability plots. Internal validation was carried out using 500 repetitions of bootstrap-resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dataset included 2222 LDL-C and 5149 non-HDL-C investigations, 303 were classed as elevated LDL-C (13.6%) and 1013 as elevated non-HDL-C cases (19.7%). Two predictors, gender and metabolic age, were identified in the LDL-C model with AuROC 0.639 (95% CI 0.617 to 0.661), poor calibration, and utility in the 7%-25% probability range. Three predictors-gender, diastolic blood pressure and metabolic age-were identified in the non-HDL-C model with AuROC 0.722 (95% CI 0.705 to 0.738), good calibration and utility in 9%-55% probability range.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Overall results demonstrated acceptable discrimination for non-HDL-C model but inadequate performance of LDL-C model for clinical practice. An external validation study should be planned for non-HDL-C model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels are paramount in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk management. However, 94.4% of Thai young adult are unaware of their condition. A diagnostic prediction model may assist in screening and alleviating underdiagnosis.

Objectives: Development and internal validation of diagnostic prediction models on elevated LDL-C (≥160 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (≥160 mg/dL).

Methods: Retrospective, single-centre, tertiary-care hospital annual health examination data from 29 March 2018 to 30 August 2023 was analysed. Two models with 11 predictors from anthropometry and bioimpedance are fitted with multivariable binary logistic regression predicting elevated LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Predictor selection used the backward stepwise elimination. Four performance metrics were quantified: discrimination using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AuROC); calibration by calibration plot; utility by decision curve analysis and instability by performance instability plots. Internal validation was carried out using 500 repetitions of bootstrap-resampling.

Results: Dataset included 2222 LDL-C and 5149 non-HDL-C investigations, 303 were classed as elevated LDL-C (13.6%) and 1013 as elevated non-HDL-C cases (19.7%). Two predictors, gender and metabolic age, were identified in the LDL-C model with AuROC 0.639 (95% CI 0.617 to 0.661), poor calibration, and utility in the 7%-25% probability range. Three predictors-gender, diastolic blood pressure and metabolic age-were identified in the non-HDL-C model with AuROC 0.722 (95% CI 0.705 to 0.738), good calibration and utility in 9%-55% probability range.

Discussion and conclusion: Overall results demonstrated acceptable discrimination for non-HDL-C model but inadequate performance of LDL-C model for clinical practice. An external validation study should be planned for non-HDL-C model.

筛选20 - 40岁泰国青年低密度和非高密度脂蛋白升高的诊断预测模型
背景:低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)水平在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的风险管理中至关重要。然而,94.4%的泰国年轻人不知道自己的病情。诊断预测模型可能有助于筛查和减轻诊断不足。目的:建立和内部验证LDL-C升高(≥160 mg/dL)和非hdl - c(≥160 mg/dL)的诊断预测模型。方法:回顾性、单中心、三级医院2018年3月29日至2023年8月30日的年度健康检查数据进行分析。采用多变量二元逻辑回归预测LDL-C和非hdl - c升高,并对人体测量学和生物阻抗的11个预测因子进行拟合。预测器选择采用反向逐步消去法。对四个绩效指标进行量化:利用接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AuROC)进行辨别;标定图标定;效用用决策曲线分析,不稳定性用性能不稳定性图分析。内部验证使用500次重复的自举重采样进行。结果:数据集包括2222例LDL-C和5149例非hdl - c调查,303例被归类为LDL-C升高(13.6%),1013例被归类为非hdl - c升高(19.7%)。在LDL-C模型中确定了两个预测因子,性别和代谢年龄,AuROC为0.639 (95% CI为0.617至0.661),校准不良,效用在7%-25%的概率范围内。性别、舒张压和代谢年龄三个预测因子在非hdl - c模型中被确定,AuROC为0.722 (95% CI为0.705至0.738),校准良好,效用在9%-55%的概率范围内。讨论与结论:总体结果表明非hdl - c模型的区分是可以接受的,但LDL-C模型在临床实践中的表现不理想。应计划非hdl - c模型的外部验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信