A systematic review of neurocognition and social cognition in body dysmorphic disorder.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Holmes À Court Katrina, Amy Malcolm, Wei Lin Toh, Susan L Rossell
{"title":"A systematic review of neurocognition and social cognition in body dysmorphic disorder.","authors":"Holmes À Court Katrina, Amy Malcolm, Wei Lin Toh, Susan L Rossell","doi":"10.1177/00048674241309747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neurocognitive underpinnings are implicated in the aetiology and maintenance of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD); however, inconsistent findings across a range of neurocognitive domains suggest that a comprehensive synthesis of the literature using a hierarchical framework of neurocognition is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A final search across OVID Medline, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science databases was conducted on 20 June 2024 to identify research that examined performance on behavioural tasks of objective neurocognition in BDD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fifty-four studies aligned with the following inclusion criteria: (1) full-text; (2) peer-reviewed; (3) published in English; (4) employed a neurocognitive task with an objective outcome and (5) involved a case-controlled paradigm consisting of BDD and healthy control samples. Findings were synthesised according to neurocognitive sub-domains viewed as a hierarchy from basic to higher-level domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neurocognitive differences in BDD relative to controls were identified at almost all levels of the hierarchy, most consistently in the upper domains of executive function and social cognition. Vulnerabilities were also demonstrated in the sub-domains of visual perception of faces, Gestalt processing, selective attention to faces and verbal memory. Methodological limitations or the influence of neurocognitive sub-groups may contribute to inconsistencies across the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although neurocognitive differences appear central to BDD, a picture of neurocognitive heterogeneity emerged with the salience of stimuli important and a likely bias to local-over-global processing demonstrated across the domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"224-247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241309747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neurocognitive underpinnings are implicated in the aetiology and maintenance of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD); however, inconsistent findings across a range of neurocognitive domains suggest that a comprehensive synthesis of the literature using a hierarchical framework of neurocognition is needed.

Methods: A final search across OVID Medline, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science databases was conducted on 20 June 2024 to identify research that examined performance on behavioural tasks of objective neurocognition in BDD. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fifty-four studies aligned with the following inclusion criteria: (1) full-text; (2) peer-reviewed; (3) published in English; (4) employed a neurocognitive task with an objective outcome and (5) involved a case-controlled paradigm consisting of BDD and healthy control samples. Findings were synthesised according to neurocognitive sub-domains viewed as a hierarchy from basic to higher-level domains.

Results: Neurocognitive differences in BDD relative to controls were identified at almost all levels of the hierarchy, most consistently in the upper domains of executive function and social cognition. Vulnerabilities were also demonstrated in the sub-domains of visual perception of faces, Gestalt processing, selective attention to faces and verbal memory. Methodological limitations or the influence of neurocognitive sub-groups may contribute to inconsistencies across the literature.

Conclusions: Although neurocognitive differences appear central to BDD, a picture of neurocognitive heterogeneity emerged with the salience of stimuli important and a likely bias to local-over-global processing demonstrated across the domains.

躯体畸形障碍的神经认知与社会认知的系统综述。
目的:神经认知基础与躯体畸形障碍(BDD)的病因和维持有关;然而,在一系列神经认知领域中不一致的发现表明,需要使用神经认知的层次框架对文献进行全面综合。方法:于2024年6月20日对OVID Medline、PsycNET、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行最终检索,以确定对BDD患者客观神经认知行为任务表现的研究。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。54项研究符合以下纳入标准:(1)全文;(2)同行评审;(三)以英文出版的;(4)采用具有客观结果的神经认知任务;(5)采用由BDD和健康对照样本组成的病例对照范式。研究结果是根据从基本到高级的神经认知子域的层次结构进行综合的。结果:与对照组相比,BDD的神经认知差异几乎存在于所有层次,最一致的是执行功能和社会认知的上层领域。在面部视觉感知、格式塔加工、选择性注意和言语记忆等子领域也存在脆弱性。方法学的局限性或神经认知亚群的影响可能导致文献中的不一致。结论:尽管神经认知差异似乎是BDD的核心,但神经认知异质性的图景出现在重要刺激的显著性和可能的局部比全局加工的偏见中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信