Perceptions of eHealth and digitalization among professional anaesthesia personnel: A Swedish national study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pether Jildenstål, Camilla Viseu, Kristian Hermander, Carina Sjöberg, Katarina Hallén, Randolph Schnorbus, Annelie Augustinsson
{"title":"Perceptions of eHealth and digitalization among professional anaesthesia personnel: A Swedish national study.","authors":"Pether Jildenstål, Camilla Viseu, Kristian Hermander, Carina Sjöberg, Katarina Hallén, Randolph Schnorbus, Annelie Augustinsson","doi":"10.1111/aas.14587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate anaesthesia care professionals' perceptions and attitudes regarding the implementation and advancement of digital solutions in perioperative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anaesthesia personnel working in public Swedish institutions where anaesthesia is administered were invited to respond to an online survey regarding their attitudes towards digitalization in the workplace and their perceptions of information provision and future digitalization within anaesthesia and surgical healthcare. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis tests, and post-hoc pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 64.0% (n = 627). Most respondents agreed/strongly agreed that digital solutions facilitate their work, the preoperative preparation, patient participation, and being involved in the patients' journeys throughout the perioperative care process. The majority also agreed/strongly agreed that digital solutions could make more patients adequately prepared before anaesthesia/surgery, reduce the number of non-optimized patients, and adapt the perioperative process to the patients' individual needs, as well as lead to reduced costs for the healthcare provider and reduced cancelled anaesthesia/surgeries. However, there were statistically significant differences between responses in relation to age groups, where the largest differences were observed between respondents in the age groups 20-30 and 61-70 years and in relation to what part of Sweden respondents worked in, with the largest differences between respondents working in Southern Sweden and the middle part of Sweden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swedish anaesthesia personnel are confident that digital solutions may enhance the efficiency of care within the anaesthesia setting. However, varying perceptions on the benefits and necessity of digital solutions are indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate anaesthesia care professionals' perceptions and attitudes regarding the implementation and advancement of digital solutions in perioperative care.

Methods: Anaesthesia personnel working in public Swedish institutions where anaesthesia is administered were invited to respond to an online survey regarding their attitudes towards digitalization in the workplace and their perceptions of information provision and future digitalization within anaesthesia and surgical healthcare. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis tests, and post-hoc pairwise comparisons.

Results: The survey response rate was 64.0% (n = 627). Most respondents agreed/strongly agreed that digital solutions facilitate their work, the preoperative preparation, patient participation, and being involved in the patients' journeys throughout the perioperative care process. The majority also agreed/strongly agreed that digital solutions could make more patients adequately prepared before anaesthesia/surgery, reduce the number of non-optimized patients, and adapt the perioperative process to the patients' individual needs, as well as lead to reduced costs for the healthcare provider and reduced cancelled anaesthesia/surgeries. However, there were statistically significant differences between responses in relation to age groups, where the largest differences were observed between respondents in the age groups 20-30 and 61-70 years and in relation to what part of Sweden respondents worked in, with the largest differences between respondents working in Southern Sweden and the middle part of Sweden.

Conclusion: Swedish anaesthesia personnel are confident that digital solutions may enhance the efficiency of care within the anaesthesia setting. However, varying perceptions on the benefits and necessity of digital solutions are indicated.

专业麻醉人员对电子健康和数字化的看法:瑞典国家研究。
背景:本研究的目的是评估麻醉护理专业人员对围手术期护理中数字解决方案的实施和进步的看法和态度。方法:邀请瑞典公立麻醉机构的麻醉人员进行在线调查,了解他们对工作场所数字化的态度,以及他们对麻醉和外科保健中信息提供和未来数字化的看法。数据分析采用描述性统计、独立样本Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后两两比较。结果:调查回复率为64.0% (n = 627)。大多数受访者同意/强烈同意数字解决方案促进了他们的工作、术前准备、患者参与以及在围手术期护理过程中参与患者的旅程。大多数人还同意/强烈同意,数字解决方案可以使更多患者在麻醉/手术前做好充分准备,减少非优化患者的数量,使围手术期过程适应患者的个人需求,并降低医疗保健提供者的成本,减少取消的麻醉/手术。然而,在不同年龄组的回答之间存在统计学上的显著差异,其中最大的差异是在20-30岁和61-70岁年龄组的受访者之间观察到的,以及与瑞典受访者工作的部分有关,在瑞典南部和瑞典中部工作的受访者之间的差异最大。结论:瑞典麻醉人员相信数字化解决方案可以提高麻醉环境中的护理效率。然而,对数字解决方案的好处和必要性有不同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信