Hemodynamic analysis of left ventricular unloading with Impella versus IABP during VA-ECMO.

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Print Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02431-2024-03
Honglong Yu, Yuehu Wu, Xuefeng Feng, Yuan He, Qilian Xie, Hu Peng
{"title":"Hemodynamic analysis of left ventricular unloading with Impella versus IABP during VA-ECMO.","authors":"Honglong Yu, Yuehu Wu, Xuefeng Feng, Yuan He, Qilian Xie, Hu Peng","doi":"10.37190/abb-02431-2024-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: The utilization of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella has been suggested as means of left ventricular unloading in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients. This study aimed to assess the local hemodynamic alterations in VA-ECMO patients through simulation analyses. <i>Methods</i>: In this study, a 0D-3D multiscale model was developed, wherein resistance conditions were employed to define the flow-pressure relationship. An idealized model was employed for the aorta, and simulations were conducted to contrast the hemodynamics supported by two configurations: VA-ECMO combined with IABP, and VA-ECMO combined with Impella. <i>Results</i>: In relation to VA-ECMO alone, the combination treatment had the following differences: (1) overall mean mass flow rate increased significantly when combined with Impella and did not change significantly when combined with IABP. Blood flow pulsatility was the strongest in ECMO + IABP, and blood flow pulsatility was significantly suppressed in ECMO + Impella; (2) for all arterial inlets, HI was decreased with ECMO + Impella and increased with ECMO + IABP; (3) the flow field did not change much with ECMO + IABP, with better blood flow compliance, whereas the flow field was relatively more chaotic and disorganized with ECMO + Impella; (4) the difference between shear stress values in ECMO + IABP and ECMO alone was small, and ECMO + Impella (P6) had the largest shear stress values. <i>Conclusions</i>: Variances in hemodynamic efficacy between VA-ECMO combined with IABP and VA-ECMO combined with Impella may underlie divergent prognoses and complications. The approach to ventricular unloading during ECMO and the degree of support should be meticulously tailored to individual patient conditions, as they represent pivotal factors influencing vascular complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"26 2","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02431-2024-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The utilization of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella has been suggested as means of left ventricular unloading in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients. This study aimed to assess the local hemodynamic alterations in VA-ECMO patients through simulation analyses. Methods: In this study, a 0D-3D multiscale model was developed, wherein resistance conditions were employed to define the flow-pressure relationship. An idealized model was employed for the aorta, and simulations were conducted to contrast the hemodynamics supported by two configurations: VA-ECMO combined with IABP, and VA-ECMO combined with Impella. Results: In relation to VA-ECMO alone, the combination treatment had the following differences: (1) overall mean mass flow rate increased significantly when combined with Impella and did not change significantly when combined with IABP. Blood flow pulsatility was the strongest in ECMO + IABP, and blood flow pulsatility was significantly suppressed in ECMO + Impella; (2) for all arterial inlets, HI was decreased with ECMO + Impella and increased with ECMO + IABP; (3) the flow field did not change much with ECMO + IABP, with better blood flow compliance, whereas the flow field was relatively more chaotic and disorganized with ECMO + Impella; (4) the difference between shear stress values in ECMO + IABP and ECMO alone was small, and ECMO + Impella (P6) had the largest shear stress values. Conclusions: Variances in hemodynamic efficacy between VA-ECMO combined with IABP and VA-ECMO combined with Impella may underlie divergent prognoses and complications. The approach to ventricular unloading during ECMO and the degree of support should be meticulously tailored to individual patient conditions, as they represent pivotal factors influencing vascular complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信