Knee phenotypes distribution according to CPAK classification in Turkish population.

Vahit Emre Özden, Göksel Dikmen, Kayahan Karaytuğ, Arda Mavi, Yılmaz Onat Köylüoğlu, İsmail Remzi Tözün
{"title":"Knee phenotypes distribution according to CPAK classification in Turkish population.","authors":"Vahit Emre Özden, Göksel Dikmen, Kayahan Karaytuğ, Arda Mavi, Yılmaz Onat Köylüoğlu, İsmail Remzi Tözün","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.24053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the distribution of knee phenotypes based on the CPAK classification in healthy nonarthritic subjects and osteoarthritic patients in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiological EOS analysis of nonarthritic 1172 knees and osteoarthritic 571 knees was evaluated to clarify the distribution of CPAK classification. The knees were categorized into 9 subgroups according to the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle and joint-line obliquity (JLO). The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were used to calculate aHKA and JLO. The Sectra workstation program was used for all radiological measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the nonarthritic group, CPAK distribution was 20.9% type I (n=245), 2.5% type II (n=30), 0.08% type III (n=1), 46.67% type IV (n=545), 7.7% type V (n=91), 0.7% type VI (n=9), 18% type VII (n=211), 2.9% type VIII (n=35), 0.2% type IX (n=3). The mean JLO was 173.7 ± 4.38, and the mean aHKA was 0.15 ± 3.81 in nonarthritic group. Arthritic group CPAK type distribution was 20.7% type I (n=118), 3.1% type II (n=18), 0.17% type III (n=1), 57.1% type IV (n=326), 8.4% type V (n=48), 0.17% type VI (n=1), 7.8% type VII (n=45), 1.4% type VIII (n=8), and 0.8% type IX (n=5). The mean JLO was 174.2 ± 3.78, and the mean aHKA was !2.21 ± 4.48 in the osteoarthritic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPAK type IV and CPAK type I were the most common subgroups in the nonarthritic and arthritic groups. CPAK type 5, which is the target of the mechanical alignment strategy, is only 7.8% in the nonarthritic group and 8.4% in the osteoarthritic group in the Turkish population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Diagnostic Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"58 6","pages":"341-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.24053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the distribution of knee phenotypes based on the CPAK classification in healthy nonarthritic subjects and osteoarthritic patients in Türkiye.

Methods: Radiological EOS analysis of nonarthritic 1172 knees and osteoarthritic 571 knees was evaluated to clarify the distribution of CPAK classification. The knees were categorized into 9 subgroups according to the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle and joint-line obliquity (JLO). The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were used to calculate aHKA and JLO. The Sectra workstation program was used for all radiological measurements.

Results: In the nonarthritic group, CPAK distribution was 20.9% type I (n=245), 2.5% type II (n=30), 0.08% type III (n=1), 46.67% type IV (n=545), 7.7% type V (n=91), 0.7% type VI (n=9), 18% type VII (n=211), 2.9% type VIII (n=35), 0.2% type IX (n=3). The mean JLO was 173.7 ± 4.38, and the mean aHKA was 0.15 ± 3.81 in nonarthritic group. Arthritic group CPAK type distribution was 20.7% type I (n=118), 3.1% type II (n=18), 0.17% type III (n=1), 57.1% type IV (n=326), 8.4% type V (n=48), 0.17% type VI (n=1), 7.8% type VII (n=45), 1.4% type VIII (n=8), and 0.8% type IX (n=5). The mean JLO was 174.2 ± 3.78, and the mean aHKA was !2.21 ± 4.48 in the osteoarthritic group.

Conclusion: CPAK type IV and CPAK type I were the most common subgroups in the nonarthritic and arthritic groups. CPAK type 5, which is the target of the mechanical alignment strategy, is only 7.8% in the nonarthritic group and 8.4% in the osteoarthritic group in the Turkish population.

Level of evidence: Level III, Diagnostic Study.

土耳其人群按CPAK分类的膝关节表型分布。
目的:本研究旨在探讨基于CPAK分类的健康无关节炎受试者和骨关节炎患者膝关节表型的分布。方法:对1172例无关节炎膝和571例骨关节炎膝进行影像学EOS分析,明确CPAK分型的分布。根据计算髋关节-膝关节-踝关节(aHKA)角度和关节线倾斜度(JLO)将膝关节分为9个亚组。采用胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)和股骨外侧远端角(LDFA)计算aHKA和JLO。Sectra工作站程序用于所有放射测量。结果:无关节炎组CPAK分布为I型20.9%(245例)、II型2.5%(30例)、III型0.08%(1例)、IV型46.67%(545例)、V型7.7%(91例)、VI型0.7%(9例)、VII型18%(211例)、VIII型2.9%(35例)、IX型0.2%(3例)。无关节炎组JLO平均值为173.7±4.38,aHKA平均值为0.15±3.81。关节炎组CPAK型分布为ⅰ型20.7%(118例)、ⅱ型3.1%(18例)、ⅲ型0.17%(1例)、ⅳ型57.1%(326例)、V型8.4%(48例)、VI型0.17%(1例)、VII型7.8%(45例)、VIII型1.4%(8例)、IX型0.8%(5例)。骨关节炎组JLO平均值为174.2±3.78,aHKA平均值为2.21±4.48。结论:在非关节炎组和关节炎组中,CPAK IV型和CPAK I型是最常见的亚型。CPAK 5型是机械对准策略的目标,在土耳其人群中,非关节炎组仅为7.8%,骨关节炎组为8.4%。证据等级:III级,诊断性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信