Overcrowding in prisons: Health and legal implications.

Eva Nudd, Maha Aon, Kalliopi Kambanella, Marie Brasholt
{"title":"Overcrowding in prisons: Health and legal implications.","authors":"Eva Nudd, Maha Aon, Kalliopi Kambanella, Marie Brasholt","doi":"10.7146/torture.v34i3.147571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prison overcrowding can be defined in different ways, and no universal definition exists. More than 120 countries report prison occupancy rates above their own capacity. This paper provides an overview of legal and health implications of overcrowding, analyses potential causes, and provides examples of how different countries utilised non-custodial measures to reduce overcrowding to disseminate good practices as inspiration for other contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Desk study based on literature searches in medical (Pubmed and Medline) and legal sources, including Google Scholar on legal opinions, Global Lex and decisions of UN treaty bodies and regional human rights mechanisms supplemented by online searches for grey literature. In addition, examples from other countries were sought to corroborate and illustrate the points made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A range of international standards exist that provide for the conditions and treatment of people in prisons to prevent prison overcrowding and protect them from its consequences. Nonetheless, overcrowding is persistent across many countries. It is often associated with violations of human rights, including, among others, the right to be free from torture and ill-treatment, the right to health, and the right to liberty and security. The underlying factors contributing to overcrowding vary and include, among others, overuse of imprisonment, excessive use of pre-trial detention, lack of access to a lawyer and underutilisation of non-custodial measures as an alternative to detention. Non-custodial measures can be applied throughout the criminal justice process, and some countries have successfully managed to reduce their prison populations by implementing such measures.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overcrowding affects many aspects of prison life, impeding the provision of a humane and rehabilitative environment. Beyond the harm caused to persons in prisons, this may negatively impact society at large in terms of security, public health, and economy. Political will is essential in reducing prison overcrowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":75230,"journal":{"name":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","volume":"34 3","pages":"41-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torture : quarterly journal on rehabilitation of torture victims and prevention of torture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v34i3.147571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prison overcrowding can be defined in different ways, and no universal definition exists. More than 120 countries report prison occupancy rates above their own capacity. This paper provides an overview of legal and health implications of overcrowding, analyses potential causes, and provides examples of how different countries utilised non-custodial measures to reduce overcrowding to disseminate good practices as inspiration for other contexts.

Methods: Desk study based on literature searches in medical (Pubmed and Medline) and legal sources, including Google Scholar on legal opinions, Global Lex and decisions of UN treaty bodies and regional human rights mechanisms supplemented by online searches for grey literature. In addition, examples from other countries were sought to corroborate and illustrate the points made.

Results: A range of international standards exist that provide for the conditions and treatment of people in prisons to prevent prison overcrowding and protect them from its consequences. Nonetheless, overcrowding is persistent across many countries. It is often associated with violations of human rights, including, among others, the right to be free from torture and ill-treatment, the right to health, and the right to liberty and security. The underlying factors contributing to overcrowding vary and include, among others, overuse of imprisonment, excessive use of pre-trial detention, lack of access to a lawyer and underutilisation of non-custodial measures as an alternative to detention. Non-custodial measures can be applied throughout the criminal justice process, and some countries have successfully managed to reduce their prison populations by implementing such measures.

Discussion: Overcrowding affects many aspects of prison life, impeding the provision of a humane and rehabilitative environment. Beyond the harm caused to persons in prisons, this may negatively impact society at large in terms of security, public health, and economy. Political will is essential in reducing prison overcrowding.

监狱过度拥挤:健康和法律影响。
导言:监狱过度拥挤可以用不同的方式来定义,没有一个普遍的定义。120多个国家报告监狱入住率超过其自身能力。本文概述了过度拥挤对法律和健康的影响,分析了潜在的原因,并举例说明不同国家如何利用非拘禁措施减少过度拥挤,传播良好做法,作为对其他情况的启发。方法:案头研究基于医学(Pubmed和Medline)和法律来源的文献检索,包括谷歌Scholar关于法律意见、联合国条约机构和区域人权机制的全球法律和决定,并辅以在线检索灰色文献。此外,还寻求其他国家的例子来证实和说明所提出的观点。结果:现有的一系列国际标准规定了监狱中人员的条件和待遇,以防止监狱过度拥挤并保护他们免受其后果。尽管如此,在许多国家,过度拥挤一直存在。它往往与侵犯人权有关,其中包括不受酷刑和虐待的权利、健康权以及自由和安全的权利。造成过度拥挤的根本因素各不相同,除其他外,包括过度使用监禁、过度使用审前拘留、无法接触律师和没有充分利用非拘禁措施来替代拘留。非监禁措施可在整个刑事司法程序中适用,有些国家通过执行这些措施成功地减少了监狱人口。讨论:过度拥挤影响监狱生活的许多方面,妨碍提供人道和康复环境。除了对监狱中的人造成伤害之外,这还可能在安全、公共卫生和经济方面对整个社会产生负面影响。政治意愿对于减少监狱过度拥挤至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信