The effect of using walking poles on the spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures.

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Print Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02450-2024-02
Koji Ono, Yu Inoue, Ryo Yamasaki, Shigeharu Tanaka, Ryo Tanaka
{"title":"The effect of using walking poles on the spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures.","authors":"Koji Ono, Yu Inoue, Ryo Yamasaki, Shigeharu Tanaka, Ryo Tanaka","doi":"10.37190/abb-02450-2024-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: This study aimed to investigate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures when using walking poles and T-canes. <i>Methods</i>: This cross-sectional study enrolled eight patients who underwent surgery for a unilateral hip fracture (mean age of 79.0 ± 7.9 years) and 34 healthy individuals who had no symptoms (mean age of 32.1 ± 6.2 years). The outcome measures were the walking speed, trunk acceleration, and lateral lean angles of the trunk, shoulder and pelvis during walking. The results were compared among the three types of walking aids, namely, a T-cane, double T-canes and walking poles. <i>Results</i>: Acceleration indices step symmetry in the vertical and anteroposterior directions in walking with walking poles were significantly larger than that in walking with a T-cane. These results were common in patients with fractures and healthy individuals. <i>Conclusions</i>: Walking with walking poles might be a more symmetrical gait style than walking with a T-cane in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"26 2","pages":"115-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02450-2024-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures when using walking poles and T-canes. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled eight patients who underwent surgery for a unilateral hip fracture (mean age of 79.0 ± 7.9 years) and 34 healthy individuals who had no symptoms (mean age of 32.1 ± 6.2 years). The outcome measures were the walking speed, trunk acceleration, and lateral lean angles of the trunk, shoulder and pelvis during walking. The results were compared among the three types of walking aids, namely, a T-cane, double T-canes and walking poles. Results: Acceleration indices step symmetry in the vertical and anteroposterior directions in walking with walking poles were significantly larger than that in walking with a T-cane. These results were common in patients with fractures and healthy individuals. Conclusions: Walking with walking poles might be a more symmetrical gait style than walking with a T-cane in patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures.

使用步行杆对髋部骨折手术患者时空步态参数的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨髋部骨折手术患者在使用助行杆和t型手杖时时空步态参数的差异。方法:本横断面研究纳入8例接受单侧髋部骨折手术的患者(平均年龄79.0±7.9岁)和34例无症状的健康个体(平均年龄32.1±6.2岁)。结果测量为行走速度、躯干加速度、行走时躯干、肩膀和骨盆的侧倾角度。比较了t型拐杖、双t型拐杖和助行杆三种助行工具的使用效果。结果:使用助行杆行走时垂直方向和前后方向的加速度指标均明显大于使用t型拐杖行走时。这些结果在骨折患者和健康个体中很常见。结论:对于髋部骨折手术患者,使用助行杆行走可能比使用t型手杖行走更为对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信