Evaluating the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding-estimator tool for transurethral resection of prostate

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/bco2.480
Lu Yu Kuo, Zhong Li Titus Lim, Caitlin Letch, Joshua Silverman, Jason Jae Yeun Kim, Scott McClintock
{"title":"Evaluating the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding-estimator tool for transurethral resection of prostate","authors":"Lu Yu Kuo,&nbsp;Zhong Li Titus Lim,&nbsp;Caitlin Letch,&nbsp;Joshua Silverman,&nbsp;Jason Jae Yeun Kim,&nbsp;Scott McClintock","doi":"10.1002/bco2.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided <i>t</i> test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7–25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6–12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7–44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0–40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2–15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding risk-estimation tool to predict for clinically significant postoperative haematuria in patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).

Patients and Methods

A single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients underwent TURP from April 2019 to December 2023 for treatment of symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia. The primary objective was to evaluate reliability of HAS-BLED score in predicting postoperative bleeding event. A focus sub-analysis was performed on anticoagulated patient cohort. Each patient was categorised in to HASBLED low-, moderate- and high-risk group according to the preestablished estimator tool. Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological and operative details were collected. Events of clinically significant haematuria within 3 months postoperatively were captured. Cohort characteristics and outcome were analysed with two-sided t test and ANOVA test. Further weight-adjusted multivariable analysis and ROC curve was performed to evaluate the predictive value of HAS-BLED score.

Results

Our analysis showed that patients assigned as high-risk by HAS-BLED were at 2.17-times higher chance of developing clinically significant haematuria compared to the low-risk patients. The risk for high-risk patient was 18.5% (95%CI 11.7–25.3%) and 8.5% (95%CI 4.6–12.4%) for low-risk patients. Moderate-risk did not demonstrate any significant difference relative to the low-risk group. Sub-analysis of 113 patients receiving long-term anticoagulation accentuates the utility of the tool. The risk of haematuria for high-risk patient was 32.7% (95%CI 20.7–44.7%), moderate-risk patient was 28.7% (95%CI 17.0–40.3%), and low-risk patient was 9.7% (95%CI 4.2–15.2%). In this cohort, the risk of haematuria was 3.37 and 2.96 times higher in the high and moderate-risk compared to the low-risk group, respectively.

Conclusion

This is the first study to validate a bleeding estimator tool for TURP patients. High HAS-BLED score positively predicts clinically significant post-TURP haematuria, particularly for patients receiving anticoagulation therapy.

Abstract Image

评估经尿道前列腺切除术中ha - bleeding-estimator工具的效用。
目的:评估HAS-BLED出血风险评估工具对经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)患者术后血尿临床意义的预测作用。患者和方法:对2019年4月至2023年12月接受TURP治疗的症状性良性前列腺增生患者进行单中心、回顾性队列分析。主要目的是评估HAS-BLED评分预测术后出血事件的可靠性。对抗凝患者队列进行焦点亚组分析。根据预先建立的估计工具,将患者分为HASBLED低、中、高危组。收集患者的人口统计学、临床、病理和手术细节。记录术后3个月内临床显著血尿事件。采用双侧t检验和方差分析分析队列特征和结局。进一步采用加权校正多变量分析和ROC曲线评价HAS-BLED评分的预测价值。结果:我们的分析显示,与低风险患者相比,被HAS-BLED划分为高风险的患者发生临床显著血尿的机会高出2.17倍。高危患者的风险为18.5% (95%CI 11.7 ~ 25.3%),低危患者的风险为8.5% (95%CI 4.6 ~ 12.4%)。中等风险组与低风险组相比没有显著差异。113例接受长期抗凝治疗的患者的亚分析强调了该工具的实用性。高危患者血尿风险为32.7% (95%CI 20.7 ~ 44.7%),中危患者为28.7% (95%CI 17.0 ~ 40.3%),低危患者为9.7% (95%CI 4.2 ~ 15.2%)。在该队列中,与低危组相比,高危组和中危组血尿的风险分别高出3.37倍和2.96倍。结论:这是第一个验证TURP患者出血评估工具的研究。高HAS-BLED评分能积极预测turp术后血尿的临床意义,特别是接受抗凝治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信