Neuromuscular monitoring and incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a prospective observational study.

Alessandra Piersanti, Rossella Garra, Fabio Sbaraglia, Miryam Del Vicario, Rosa Lamacchia, Marco Rossi
{"title":"Neuromuscular monitoring and incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Alessandra Piersanti, Rossella Garra, Fabio Sbaraglia, Miryam Del Vicario, Rosa Lamacchia, Marco Rossi","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00226-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are routinely used in anesthesia practice. An undetected, incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function at the end of surgery potentially exposes patients to clinical deterioration in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) in a cohort of patients receiving NMBAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 90 spontaneously breathing adult patients admitted to the recovery room (RR) after completion of surgeries having received at least 1 dose of NMBA. Anesthesia management, the dosage of NMBA used, and whether monitoring of neuromonitoring function was employed or if a reversal agent was administered were all at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, who was unaware that neuromuscular function was going to be monitored in the RR. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of RNMB (defined as a train-of-four ratio ≤ 0.9). The secondary objectives were the number of postoperative adverse respiratory events and, for exploratory purposes, the estimation of potential risk factors through logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RNMB occurred in 5 (5%) patients who had received only one dose of NMBA at induction of anesthesia. Two patients with RNMB (40%) required O<sub>2</sub> supplementation during monitoring in the RR, compared to 11 patients in the rest of the sample (13%). Additionally, 2 of these patients (2%) required O<sub>2</sub> supplementation before hospital discharge due to O<sub>2</sub> desaturation < 92%. None of the patients with RNMB had received a reversal of neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery. The association between RNMB and potential risk factors, assessed through multivariable logistic regression did not yield significant results for any of the considered variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RNMB can occur even when a single dose of NMBAs is administered. Despite decades of extensive literature on the risks of RNMB and recent guidelines, routine monitoring of neuromuscular function and pharmacologic reversal of NMBA is still substandard. Routine monitoring of neuromuscular function is strongly advocated to enhance the level of patient care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT06193213 , date of registration: 05/01/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00226-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are routinely used in anesthesia practice. An undetected, incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function at the end of surgery potentially exposes patients to clinical deterioration in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) in a cohort of patients receiving NMBAs.

Methods: We enrolled 90 spontaneously breathing adult patients admitted to the recovery room (RR) after completion of surgeries having received at least 1 dose of NMBA. Anesthesia management, the dosage of NMBA used, and whether monitoring of neuromonitoring function was employed or if a reversal agent was administered were all at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, who was unaware that neuromuscular function was going to be monitored in the RR. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of RNMB (defined as a train-of-four ratio ≤ 0.9). The secondary objectives were the number of postoperative adverse respiratory events and, for exploratory purposes, the estimation of potential risk factors through logistic regression analysis.

Results: RNMB occurred in 5 (5%) patients who had received only one dose of NMBA at induction of anesthesia. Two patients with RNMB (40%) required O2 supplementation during monitoring in the RR, compared to 11 patients in the rest of the sample (13%). Additionally, 2 of these patients (2%) required O2 supplementation before hospital discharge due to O2 desaturation < 92%. None of the patients with RNMB had received a reversal of neuromuscular blockade at the end of surgery. The association between RNMB and potential risk factors, assessed through multivariable logistic regression did not yield significant results for any of the considered variables.

Conclusions: RNMB can occur even when a single dose of NMBAs is administered. Despite decades of extensive literature on the risks of RNMB and recent guidelines, routine monitoring of neuromuscular function and pharmacologic reversal of NMBA is still substandard. Routine monitoring of neuromuscular function is strongly advocated to enhance the level of patient care.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT06193213 , date of registration: 05/01/2024).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信