The clinical impact of conventional therapies for adults and adolescents suffering from eosinophilic esophagitis, a type 2 inflammatory chronic disease, and their economic consequences in Italy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Giorgio Walter Canonica MD , Gherardo Mazziotti MD, PhD , Alessandro Repici MD , Massimiliano Povero PhD , Luca Castello MSc , Lorenzo Pradelli MD , Miryana Dobreva MSc , Francesca Fanelli MSc , Jean Pierre Saab MD , Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino MD, PhD
{"title":"The clinical impact of conventional therapies for adults and adolescents suffering from eosinophilic esophagitis, a type 2 inflammatory chronic disease, and their economic consequences in Italy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis","authors":"Giorgio Walter Canonica MD ,&nbsp;Gherardo Mazziotti MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Repici MD ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Povero PhD ,&nbsp;Luca Castello MSc ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pradelli MD ,&nbsp;Miryana Dobreva MSc ,&nbsp;Francesca Fanelli MSc ,&nbsp;Jean Pierre Saab MD ,&nbsp;Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Despite advances in understanding and management, optimal therapeutic strategies remain unclear, with conflicting guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to evaluate effectiveness and safety of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in managing EoE and their economic implications in Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2023 and 78 publications were included, covering treatment outcomes and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety across various patient populations and study designs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TCSs showed superior efficacy over PPIs in achieving histologic, endoscopic, and partial clinical responses. Older patients responded better to both treatments. Treatment outcomes varied by sex and presence of atopic conditions. TCSs discontinuation increased the risk of clinical relapse (0.70 cases per person-year), whereas continuous use was linked to a rise in nonserious adverse events (dilation, infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and skin disorders). Economic analysis indicated cost variations based on treatment regimens and follow-up protocols, with dilation and relapse being significant cost drivers in Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review provides insights into efficacy, safety, and economic impact of TCSs and PPIs in managing EoE. TCSs were more effective in achieving histologic and endoscopic responses, whereas PPIs were effective in reducing symptoms. Standardized treatment guidelines are needed because of varied treatment efficacy across studies. Future research and new therapies may enhance outcomes and reduce health care costs, improving patient quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Despite advances in understanding and management, optimal therapeutic strategies remain unclear, with conflicting guidelines.

Objective

We sought to evaluate effectiveness and safety of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in managing EoE and their economic implications in Italy.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2023 and 78 publications were included, covering treatment outcomes and adverse events. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate treatment efficacy and safety across various patient populations and study designs.

Results

TCSs showed superior efficacy over PPIs in achieving histologic, endoscopic, and partial clinical responses. Older patients responded better to both treatments. Treatment outcomes varied by sex and presence of atopic conditions. TCSs discontinuation increased the risk of clinical relapse (0.70 cases per person-year), whereas continuous use was linked to a rise in nonserious adverse events (dilation, infections, upper respiratory tract infections, and skin disorders). Economic analysis indicated cost variations based on treatment regimens and follow-up protocols, with dilation and relapse being significant cost drivers in Italy.

Conclusions

This review provides insights into efficacy, safety, and economic impact of TCSs and PPIs in managing EoE. TCSs were more effective in achieving histologic and endoscopic responses, whereas PPIs were effective in reducing symptoms. Standardized treatment guidelines are needed because of varied treatment efficacy across studies. Future research and new therapies may enhance outcomes and reduce health care costs, improving patient quality of life.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信