The prevalence of aortic stenosis in Māori undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography compared to New Zealand Europeans.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Matthew K Moore, Gregory T Jones, Gillian Whalley, Michael Ja Williams, Ralph A Stewart, Sean Coffey
{"title":"The prevalence of aortic stenosis in Māori undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography compared to New Zealand Europeans.","authors":"Matthew K Moore, Gregory T Jones, Gillian Whalley, Michael Ja Williams, Ralph A Stewart, Sean Coffey","doi":"10.26635/6965.6621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>There are limited data on the prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) in Māori and known inequities in outcomes after aortic valve intervention. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CAVD in Māori.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from initial clinically indicated echocardiograms performed between 2010 to 2018 in patients aged ≥18 years were linked to nationally collected outcome data. Ethnicity was defined using protocols from the Ministry of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23,635 patients, 1,312 (5.6%) identified as Māori, and 22,323 (94.4%) as European. Prevalence of aortic stenosis was 5.3% in Māori and 9.9% in Europeans. Age-specific prevalence did not differ between the two groups. Māori with CAVD were more than twice as likely to have advanced cardiac impairment (right ventricular dysfunction) than Europeans (10.1% vs 4.6, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age-specific CAVD rates did not differ between Māori and Europeans, though Māori had a higher proportion of advanced cardiac impairment, which is likely unrelated to CAVD. Differences in population structure likely explain the difference in overall prevalence of CAVD. The improving life expectancy in Māori may lead to increasing incidence of CAVD, thus strategies to improve detection and medical management of CAVD should begin as soon as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"138 1608","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: There are limited data on the prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) in Māori and known inequities in outcomes after aortic valve intervention. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CAVD in Māori.

Methods: Data from initial clinically indicated echocardiograms performed between 2010 to 2018 in patients aged ≥18 years were linked to nationally collected outcome data. Ethnicity was defined using protocols from the Ministry of Health.

Results: Of the 23,635 patients, 1,312 (5.6%) identified as Māori, and 22,323 (94.4%) as European. Prevalence of aortic stenosis was 5.3% in Māori and 9.9% in Europeans. Age-specific prevalence did not differ between the two groups. Māori with CAVD were more than twice as likely to have advanced cardiac impairment (right ventricular dysfunction) than Europeans (10.1% vs 4.6, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Age-specific CAVD rates did not differ between Māori and Europeans, though Māori had a higher proportion of advanced cardiac impairment, which is likely unrelated to CAVD. Differences in population structure likely explain the difference in overall prevalence of CAVD. The improving life expectancy in Māori may lead to increasing incidence of CAVD, thus strategies to improve detection and medical management of CAVD should begin as soon as possible.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信