Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Larissa Maiara da Silva Alves Souza, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Paula Dias De Oliveira, Laura Rossi, Viviane Martins da Silva, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros
{"title":"Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure.","authors":"Larissa Maiara da Silva Alves Souza, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Paula Dias De Oliveira, Laura Rossi, Viviane Martins da Silva, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the accuracy of nursing diagnoses at hospital admission and discharge for patients with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative study examined the documentation in 155 medical records of patients with an admitting diagnosis of HF during August 2018 and July 2019. An audit tool was used to record the diagnoses made by nurses during routine care at the time of admission and discharge. Two researchers (L.S. and A.C.) examined the records and evaluated the documented nursing diagnoses using the Nursing Diagnosis Accuracy Scale version 2. Kappa was used for agreement between them. Patient social and clinical characteristics were described using percentages, absolute frequencies, means, and standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 18 unique nursing diagnoses were identified across the 155 patients. Among the 754 nursing diagnoses recorded, 85% of those identified at admission (n = 644) were deemed highly accurate. At discharge, of the 527 diagnoses recorded, 66% (n = 349) were rated as highly accurate. Excess fluid volume was the most common diagnosis (85% at admission, 49% at discharge). Three risk diagnoses were frequent at both points: risk for infection, risk for falls, and risk for decreased cardiac output. Agreement between evaluators ranged from Κ = 0.234 to 1.00.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater agreement in nursing diagnoses at discharge likely reflects ongoing patient monitoring. Persistent diagnoses at discharge highlight the need for continued nursing care post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>This study encourages nurses to improve clinical evaluation for HF patients from admission to discharge. As key clinical indicators are identified, nurses can improve the accuracy of their diagnoses and plan more effective interventions to achieve positive health outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of nursing diagnoses at hospital admission and discharge for patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods: This comparative study examined the documentation in 155 medical records of patients with an admitting diagnosis of HF during August 2018 and July 2019. An audit tool was used to record the diagnoses made by nurses during routine care at the time of admission and discharge. Two researchers (L.S. and A.C.) examined the records and evaluated the documented nursing diagnoses using the Nursing Diagnosis Accuracy Scale version 2. Kappa was used for agreement between them. Patient social and clinical characteristics were described using percentages, absolute frequencies, means, and standard deviations.

Findings: A total of 18 unique nursing diagnoses were identified across the 155 patients. Among the 754 nursing diagnoses recorded, 85% of those identified at admission (n = 644) were deemed highly accurate. At discharge, of the 527 diagnoses recorded, 66% (n = 349) were rated as highly accurate. Excess fluid volume was the most common diagnosis (85% at admission, 49% at discharge). Three risk diagnoses were frequent at both points: risk for infection, risk for falls, and risk for decreased cardiac output. Agreement between evaluators ranged from Κ = 0.234 to 1.00.

Conclusions: Greater agreement in nursing diagnoses at discharge likely reflects ongoing patient monitoring. Persistent diagnoses at discharge highlight the need for continued nursing care post-discharge.

Implications for nursing practice: This study encourages nurses to improve clinical evaluation for HF patients from admission to discharge. As key clinical indicators are identified, nurses can improve the accuracy of their diagnoses and plan more effective interventions to achieve positive health outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospitalization.

失代偿性心力衰竭患者入院和出院时护理诊断的准确性。
目的:探讨心力衰竭(HF)患者入院和出院时护理诊断的准确性。方法:本比较研究分析了2018年8月至2019年7月收治的155例心衰患者的病历资料。使用审计工具记录护士在入院和出院时的常规护理中所做的诊断。两位研究者(L.S.和A.C.)检查了记录,并使用护理诊断准确性量表第2版对记录的护理诊断进行了评估。Kappa是他们之间的协议。使用百分比、绝对频率、平均值和标准差描述患者的社会和临床特征。结果:155例患者共发现18个独特的护理诊断。在记录的754例护理诊断中,入院时确定的85% (n = 644)被认为是高度准确的。出院时,记录的527例诊断中,66% (n = 349)被评为高度准确。液体容量过多是最常见的诊断(入院时85%,出院时49%)。三种风险诊断在两个点上都很常见:感染风险、跌倒风险和心输出量减少风险。评估者之间的一致性范围从Κ = 0.234到1.00。结论:出院时护理诊断的更大一致性可能反映了持续的患者监测。出院时的持续诊断突出了出院后继续护理的必要性。对护理实践的启示:本研究鼓励护士提高对心衰患者从入院到出院的临床评估。随着关键临床指标的确定,护士可以提高诊断的准确性,并计划更有效的干预措施,以实现积极的健康结果,减少不必要的住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信