Medicare telehealth utilization by Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yvonne Jonk PhD, Heidi O'Connor MS, John Gale MS, Deborah Thayer MBA
{"title":"Medicare telehealth utilization by Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Yvonne Jonk PhD,&nbsp;Heidi O'Connor MS,&nbsp;John Gale MS,&nbsp;Deborah Thayer MBA","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To address the extent to which Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and independent and provider-based Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were using telehealth prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries who used outpatient services at FQHCs and RHCs were identified within the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to identify rural–urban clinic locations. Logistic regression included three-way interaction terms for time, rurality, and clinic type.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth use curbed the decline in outpatient visits for all clinic types during the pandemic. Telehealth use declined as the pandemic continued in 2021 yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels. FQHCs had higher telehealth use (18%–31%) than RHCs (8%–14%) in 2020–2021. Across all years, tele-behavioral health was the primary venue for originating and distant site providers. Overall, 19%–34% of originating site providers were psychiatrists and 10%–31% were primary care providers. Likely due to patients sheltering-in-place (at home), 2020–2021 distant site providers were largely primary care providers. Urban FQHCs experienced the largest increase in telehealth use during the pandemic (24.6% increase in urban, 14.4%–15.8% in rural) followed by rural ID_RHCs (10.2%–11.7%). RHCs were less likely to provide telehealth services than FQHCs during the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth played a key role in facilitating access to health services during the height of the pandemic (2020–2021). Telehealth flexibilities were associated with greater telehealth use among FQHCs and RHCs but did not make up for the overall decline in health service use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To address the extent to which Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and independent and provider-based Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) were using telehealth prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries who used outpatient services at FQHCs and RHCs were identified within the 2019–2021 5% Medicare Limited Data Set Outpatient and Carrier files. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were used to identify rural–urban clinic locations. Logistic regression included three-way interaction terms for time, rurality, and clinic type.

Findings

Telehealth use curbed the decline in outpatient visits for all clinic types during the pandemic. Telehealth use declined as the pandemic continued in 2021 yet remained higher than pre-pandemic levels. FQHCs had higher telehealth use (18%–31%) than RHCs (8%–14%) in 2020–2021. Across all years, tele-behavioral health was the primary venue for originating and distant site providers. Overall, 19%–34% of originating site providers were psychiatrists and 10%–31% were primary care providers. Likely due to patients sheltering-in-place (at home), 2020–2021 distant site providers were largely primary care providers. Urban FQHCs experienced the largest increase in telehealth use during the pandemic (24.6% increase in urban, 14.4%–15.8% in rural) followed by rural ID_RHCs (10.2%–11.7%). RHCs were less likely to provide telehealth services than FQHCs during the pandemic.

Conclusions

Telehealth played a key role in facilitating access to health services during the height of the pandemic (2020–2021). Telehealth flexibilities were associated with greater telehealth use among FQHCs and RHCs but did not make up for the overall decline in health service use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信