Effect of Ergonomic Intervention on Cognitive Function of Office Workers.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zahra Mottaghi, Gholamhossein Halvani, Sara Jambarsang, Amir H Mehrparvar
{"title":"Effect of Ergonomic Intervention on Cognitive Function of Office Workers.","authors":"Zahra Mottaghi, Gholamhossein Halvani, Sara Jambarsang, Amir H Mehrparvar","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_213_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different domains of cognitive function are important in some jobs, such as office work. Ergonomic risk factors may affect cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was designed to assess the effect of an ergonomic training intervention on the cognitive function of office workers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a before-after study performed in 2020 in Yazd, Iran on female office workers. Cognitive function (working memory, attention, and response time) was assessed by Wechsler working memory and Stroop tests before and after the intervention. Ergonomic intervention consisted of an ergonomic modification of the workstation and a training program about ergonomic principles of office work. Data were analyzed by SPSS (ver. 24) using paired <i>t</i>-test and the multiple regression linear model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age and work experience of the participants were 35.38 ± 1.60 and 8.54 ± 1.24 yr., respectively. Forward visual memory, response time, and interference time were significantly changed after the intervention, but the change in other aspects of cognitive function (i.e., memory span, backward visual memory, and interference score) was not statistically significant. Marital status, age, and working hours significantly affected working memory, test duration and response time, and number of errors, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that ergonomic intervention (modification of workstation and training) may significantly affect some aspects of cognitive function in office workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":"267-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_213_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different domains of cognitive function are important in some jobs, such as office work. Ergonomic risk factors may affect cognitive function.

Aim: This study was designed to assess the effect of an ergonomic training intervention on the cognitive function of office workers.

Materials and methods: This was a before-after study performed in 2020 in Yazd, Iran on female office workers. Cognitive function (working memory, attention, and response time) was assessed by Wechsler working memory and Stroop tests before and after the intervention. Ergonomic intervention consisted of an ergonomic modification of the workstation and a training program about ergonomic principles of office work. Data were analyzed by SPSS (ver. 24) using paired t-test and the multiple regression linear model.

Results: Mean age and work experience of the participants were 35.38 ± 1.60 and 8.54 ± 1.24 yr., respectively. Forward visual memory, response time, and interference time were significantly changed after the intervention, but the change in other aspects of cognitive function (i.e., memory span, backward visual memory, and interference score) was not statistically significant. Marital status, age, and working hours significantly affected working memory, test duration and response time, and number of errors, respectively.

Conclusion: This study showed that ergonomic intervention (modification of workstation and training) may significantly affect some aspects of cognitive function in office workers.

人机工程学干预对办公人员认知功能的影响。
背景:不同领域的认知功能在某些工作中很重要,比如办公室工作。人体工程学风险因素可能影响认知功能。目的:本研究旨在评估人体工程学训练干预对办公室职员认知功能的影响。材料和方法:这是2020年在伊朗亚兹德对女性办公室职员进行的一项前后对照研究。干预前后采用韦氏工作记忆和Stroop测试评估认知功能(工作记忆、注意力和反应时间)。人体工程学干预包括对工作站进行人体工程学改造和对办公室工作的人体工程学原理进行培训。数据采用SPSS统计软件进行分析。24)采用配对t检验和多元回归线性模型。结果:参与者的平均年龄为35.38±1.60岁,平均工作经验为8.54±1.24岁。干预后,前向视觉记忆、反应时间和干扰时间发生显著变化,而其他认知功能(即记忆广度、后向视觉记忆和干扰评分)的变化无统计学意义。婚姻状况、年龄和工作时间分别对工作记忆、测试持续时间和反应时间以及错误次数有显著影响。结论:本研究表明,人机工程学干预(工作站改造和训练)可显著影响办公人员认知功能的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信