Julia Kessel, Rebecca J Cleveland, Trapper Lalli, Joshua Tennant, Jennifer Woody
{"title":"Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.","authors":"Julia Kessel, Rebecca J Cleveland, Trapper Lalli, Joshua Tennant, Jennifer Woody","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Careful preoperative patient preparation for orthopedic foot and ankle surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and avoid suboptimal outcomes. Our quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days postsurgery by enhancing preoperative education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We focused on four outcomes associated with receipt of written preoperative information: (1) related ED visits within 30 days of surgery, (2) average number of patient portal messages, (3) phone calls initiated by patients, and (4) staff team experience survey results. All patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery by two surgeons at one institution from July 2023 to January 2024 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through a series of six plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles lasting 1 month each, we evaluated 431 patients (55.9% female, 61.4% White, 92.4% English speakers). Patients who received written preoperative information were significantly less likely to present to the ED for related concerns within 30 days of surgery compared with those receiving no written preoperative information (p = .0068). In addition, we observed fewer portal messages and phone calls from patients receiving written preoperative information (p = .3644, p = .0541).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increase in the use of standardized written preoperative information yields decreased ED visits and frequency of inquiries from patients through portal messages and phone calls.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Careful preoperative patient preparation for orthopedic foot and ankle surgery can help manage postoperative expectations and avoid suboptimal outcomes. Our quality improvement initiative aimed to reduce emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days postsurgery by enhancing preoperative education.
Methods: We focused on four outcomes associated with receipt of written preoperative information: (1) related ED visits within 30 days of surgery, (2) average number of patient portal messages, (3) phone calls initiated by patients, and (4) staff team experience survey results. All patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery by two surgeons at one institution from July 2023 to January 2024 were included.
Results: Through a series of six plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles lasting 1 month each, we evaluated 431 patients (55.9% female, 61.4% White, 92.4% English speakers). Patients who received written preoperative information were significantly less likely to present to the ED for related concerns within 30 days of surgery compared with those receiving no written preoperative information (p = .0068). In addition, we observed fewer portal messages and phone calls from patients receiving written preoperative information (p = .3644, p = .0541).
Conclusions: An increase in the use of standardized written preoperative information yields decreased ED visits and frequency of inquiries from patients through portal messages and phone calls.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform