Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un hospital de alta complejidad de Madrid y acciones de mejora

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
J.M. Aranaz Andrés , M.A. Espinel Ruiz , F. Roldan Moll , Miembros de la Comisión de Seguridad del Paciente del Hospital Ramón y Cajal
{"title":"Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un hospital de alta complejidad de Madrid y acciones de mejora","authors":"J.M. Aranaz Andrés ,&nbsp;M.A. Espinel Ruiz ,&nbsp;F. Roldan Moll ,&nbsp;Miembros de la Comisión de Seguridad del Paciente del Hospital Ramón y Cajal","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The culture of patient safety is reflected in the behavior of individuals within a healthcare organization, based on knowledge, beliefs, and values aimed at minimizing the harm that patients might suffer. Assessing the perception of safety culture helps in developing and implementing improvement actions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A descriptive study conducted in two phases. A patient safety culture questionnaire measuring three dimensions of the safety culture was administered, and improvement actions were developed based on the results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>300 responses were obtained, with a response rate of 10.2%. 70% were women, 40% were physicians, and 38% were nurses. 37% reported having worked at the hospital for more than 20<!--> <!-->years. The management support for patient safety dimension received 33% (CI: 29.5-35.7) of positive responses and 27% (CI: 24.3-30.2) of negative responses. The patient safety perception dimension received 67% (CI: 63.8-70.01) of positive responses and 20% (CI: 17.4-22.8) of negative responses. The supervisor/department head support for patient safety dimension received 61% (CI: 57.4-63.9) of positive responses and 19% (CI: 16.3-21.5) of negative responses.</div><div>After presenting the results to the management team, improvement actions were proposed, which led to greater commitment from the management team to patient safety, increased presence during patient safety rounds, and greater visibility of patient safety-related information available on the intranet.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A low perception of management support was detected, allowing for improvements in this dimension.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924001039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The culture of patient safety is reflected in the behavior of individuals within a healthcare organization, based on knowledge, beliefs, and values aimed at minimizing the harm that patients might suffer. Assessing the perception of safety culture helps in developing and implementing improvement actions.

Materials and methods

A descriptive study conducted in two phases. A patient safety culture questionnaire measuring three dimensions of the safety culture was administered, and improvement actions were developed based on the results.

Results

300 responses were obtained, with a response rate of 10.2%. 70% were women, 40% were physicians, and 38% were nurses. 37% reported having worked at the hospital for more than 20 years. The management support for patient safety dimension received 33% (CI: 29.5-35.7) of positive responses and 27% (CI: 24.3-30.2) of negative responses. The patient safety perception dimension received 67% (CI: 63.8-70.01) of positive responses and 20% (CI: 17.4-22.8) of negative responses. The supervisor/department head support for patient safety dimension received 61% (CI: 57.4-63.9) of positive responses and 19% (CI: 16.3-21.5) of negative responses.
After presenting the results to the management team, improvement actions were proposed, which led to greater commitment from the management team to patient safety, increased presence during patient safety rounds, and greater visibility of patient safety-related information available on the intranet.

Conclusions

A low perception of management support was detected, allowing for improvements in this dimension.
[高复杂性医院患者安全文化的感知与改进措施]。
患者安全文化反映在医疗保健组织内的个人行为中,其基础是旨在最大限度地减少患者可能遭受的伤害的知识、信仰和价值观。评估对安全文化的认识有助于制定和实施改进行动。材料与方法:分两个阶段进行描述性研究。患者安全文化问卷测量安全文化的三个维度,并根据结果制定改进措施。结果:共收到问卷300份,回复率为10.2%。70%是女性,40%是医生,38%是护士。37%的人在医院工作超过20年。管理层对患者安全维度的支持得到33% (CI: 29.5-35.7)的积极响应和27% (CI: 24.3-30.2)的消极响应。患者安全感知维度的阳性反应为67% (CI: 63.8 ~ 70.01),阴性反应为20% (CI: 17.4 ~ 22.8)。主管/科室主管对患者安全维度的支持得到了61% (CI: 57.4-63.9)的正面回应和19% (CI: 16.3-21.5)的负面回应。在将结果提交给管理团队后,提出了改进措施,这使得管理团队对患者安全做出了更大的承诺,增加了患者安全查房期间的出席率,并提高了内部网上患者安全相关信息的可见性。结论:管理支持的低感知被检测到,允许在这个维度的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信