Cytisine compared to combination nicotine replacement therapy to reduce cigarette consumption in relapsed smokers: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hassan Mir, Javad Heshmati, Kerri-Anne Mullen, Ashley Baldwin, Evyanne Quirouette, Andrew Pipe, Robert Reid
{"title":"Cytisine compared to combination nicotine replacement therapy to reduce cigarette consumption in relapsed smokers: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hassan Mir, Javad Heshmati, Kerri-Anne Mullen, Ashley Baldwin, Evyanne Quirouette, Andrew Pipe, Robert Reid","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01591-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cigarette smoking is a leading cause of death and disease, including those related to the cardiovascular system. Cytisine is a plant-based medication, which works in a similar mechanism to varenicline. It is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective for smoking cessation. While there are effective therapies such as nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, varenicline, and cytisine for smoking cessation, relapse remains common. It is unclear how best to support these individuals. This study aims to assess the feasibility of randomizing patients who relapse to combination NRT or cytisine after admission to a cardiac hospital.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized, two-group parallel feasibility trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial will recruit relapsed smokers from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive cytisine or combination NRT, alongside counseling and follow-up support. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment rates and treatment completion. Secondary outcomes include smoking cessation rates and adverse events. A total of 60 participants will be recruited using stratified randomization by sex to ensure gender balance. Data will be analyzed descriptively, focusing on feasibility and efficacy measures to inform future trials.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting patients who were recently admitted to the hospital and have relapsed to smoking within 180 days post-discharge. This will inform future studies aimed at recruiting patients who have relapsed to understand how best to support them to quit smoking. This study will also compare the acceptability, efficacy, and safety of cytisine compared to combination NRT, as demonstrated in previous studies in other populations. Notably, cytisine's shorter regimen and natural composition broaden its appeal, potentially supporting a wider spectrum of people who smoke. The study's robust design, infrastructure, and expertise enhance its feasibility. Future research avenues, especially among cardiac patients and relapsed individuals, promise further insights, potentially transforming cessation strategies worldwide.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (CT04286295) on 14 March 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04286295?locStr=Canada&country=Canada&intr=Cytisine&rank=3 .</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01591-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cigarette smoking is a leading cause of death and disease, including those related to the cardiovascular system. Cytisine is a plant-based medication, which works in a similar mechanism to varenicline. It is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective for smoking cessation. While there are effective therapies such as nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, varenicline, and cytisine for smoking cessation, relapse remains common. It is unclear how best to support these individuals. This study aims to assess the feasibility of randomizing patients who relapse to combination NRT or cytisine after admission to a cardiac hospital.

Study design: Randomized, two-group parallel feasibility trial.

Methods: This trial will recruit relapsed smokers from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive cytisine or combination NRT, alongside counseling and follow-up support. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment rates and treatment completion. Secondary outcomes include smoking cessation rates and adverse events. A total of 60 participants will be recruited using stratified randomization by sex to ensure gender balance. Data will be analyzed descriptively, focusing on feasibility and efficacy measures to inform future trials.

Discussion: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting patients who were recently admitted to the hospital and have relapsed to smoking within 180 days post-discharge. This will inform future studies aimed at recruiting patients who have relapsed to understand how best to support them to quit smoking. This study will also compare the acceptability, efficacy, and safety of cytisine compared to combination NRT, as demonstrated in previous studies in other populations. Notably, cytisine's shorter regimen and natural composition broaden its appeal, potentially supporting a wider spectrum of people who smoke. The study's robust design, infrastructure, and expertise enhance its feasibility. Future research avenues, especially among cardiac patients and relapsed individuals, promise further insights, potentially transforming cessation strategies worldwide.

Trial registration: Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (CT04286295) on 14 March 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04286295?locStr=Canada&country=Canada&intr=Cytisine&rank=3 .

胱氨酸与联合尼古丁替代疗法的比较,以减少复发吸烟者的香烟消费:一项试点随机对照试验方案。
背景:吸烟是导致死亡和疾病的主要原因,包括与心血管系统有关的疾病。胱氨酸是一种基于植物的药物,其作用机制与伐尼克兰相似。它是安全、有效和具有成本效益的戒烟方法。虽然有尼古丁替代疗法、安非他酮、伐尼克兰和胞氨酸等有效的戒烟疗法,但复发仍然很常见。目前还不清楚如何最好地支持这些人。本研究旨在评估在心脏医院入院后复发的患者随机接受NRT或cytisine联合治疗的可行性。研究设计:随机、两组平行可行性试验。方法:本试验将从渥太华大学心脏研究所招募复吸者。参与者将以1:1的比例随机接受胱氨酸或联合NRT,同时接受咨询和随访支持。可行性结果包括招募率和治疗完成率。次要结局包括戒烟率和不良事件。为确保性别平衡,将采用按性别分层随机分配的方法共招募60名参与者。将对数据进行描述性分析,重点关注可行性和有效性措施,为未来的试验提供信息。讨论:本研究的主要目的是评估招募新近入院且出院后180天内复吸的患者的可行性。这将为未来旨在招募复发患者的研究提供信息,以了解如何最好地支持他们戒烟。本研究还将比较胱氨酸与联合NRT的可接受性、有效性和安全性,正如之前在其他人群中的研究所证明的那样。值得注意的是,胱氨酸的短疗程和天然成分扩大了它的吸引力,可能支持更广泛的吸烟者。该研究的稳健设计、基础设施和专业知识增强了其可行性。未来的研究途径,特别是对心脏病患者和复发个体的研究,有望进一步深入了解,有可能改变全世界的戒烟策略。试验注册:于2022年3月14日在Clinicaltrials.gov (CT04286295)注册。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04286295?locStr=Canada&country=Canada&intr=Cytisine&rank=3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信