Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis on Image-Guided Biopsy Samples in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Feasibility Study and Comparison With Surgical Samples

Abstract

Introduction

Limited information exists on next-generation sequencing (NGS) success for lung tumors of 30 mm or less. We aimed to compare NGS success rates across biopsy techniques for these tumors, assess DNA sequencing quality, and verify reliability against surgical resection results.

Methods

We used data from the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment study, including patients with lung tumors measuring 30 mm or less who had surgery and NGS on biopsies since 2016. We collected data on biopsy type, nodule characteristics, complications, sequencing feasibility, clinical actionable variants, surgery type, and TNM classification. We compared NGS feasibility and quality between biopsy methods and, for those with NGS on surgical samples, compared feasibility, quality, and detection of actionable variants.

Results

Among the 654 participants with lung tumors of 30 mm or less who underwent surgery, 70 had NGS on prior biopsies. The median age was 68.5; 51.4% were male individuals, and 75.7% were smokers. The mean diameter of biopsied nodules was 17.7 mm, with 67.1% fine-needle aspiration, 17.1% computed tomography–guided transthoracic core needle biopsies, and 17.1% endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration. DNA sequencing was feasible in 97.1% of biopsy samples; 2.9% had low tumor cellularity. Coverage depth was achieved in 89.7% of biopsies. RNA sequencing was successful in 66.2% of biopsies, especially in core needle biopsies. Actionable alterations were found in 41.4% of patients. Among the participants, 30% had NGS on surgical samples. RNA sequencing was more feasible on surgical samples (95.2% versus 42.9% for biopsies). NGS on surgical samples matched biopsy results in 90% of patients, with 10% showing additional alterations.

Conclusion

DNA sequencing succeeded in 97.1% of biopsies of nodules 30 mm or less, whereas RNA sequencing feasibility was lower. NGS on biopsy samples is generally reliable but requires careful review.