The Picture of Health: Seeing the Health of the Chronically Challenged Through Van Gogh's Sunflowers as a Needed Revision of the Clinical Perspective

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra Pârvan
{"title":"The Picture of Health: Seeing the Health of the Chronically Challenged Through Van Gogh's Sunflowers as a Needed Revision of the Clinical Perspective","authors":"Alexandra Pârvan","doi":"10.1111/jep.14314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article identifies and offers a response to several problems that affect the quality of both clinical education and health care services. These matters are: that in clinical training and practice, health, as lived by patients (persons), is not properly considered, and is equated reductively with treating diseases/disorders; that health is seen through disease, and as restricted to a single model defined by an organism's meeting (or being returned to) biochemical or functional standards; that intellectual assumptions instilled in schools of Medicine and Psychology about realities pertaining to healthcare determine an understanding of chronic illness or life with chronic challenges focused on impairment and suffering, and not on the fuller experience of living with illness, disability or neuropsychological challenges that patients have <i>as persons</i>; that arts-based education reflects the same focus in understanding ‘illness’, and thus neglects giving attention to the creation of personal health states of those living with challenging or debilitating long-term conditions; that, consequently, the arts are instrumentalized to serve these predefined educational purposes, rather than allowed to inform clinical training through that which is intrinsic or more specific to them. As a way out of these limitations and as an illustration of how things could be done differently, Vincent Van Gogh's paintings of the <i>Sunflowers</i> are used as visual inspiration for how we could change the way we see, and construct new mental representations of ‘health’, ‘chronic illness’ or 'chronic challenges', ‘patient as person’ or even 'person as non-patient', ‘the clinician's role’ and ‘the identity of clinical practice’. Relying on Van Gogh's depictions of the sunflowers as an example and a visual basis, the article shows how characteristics typical to art (transformation, alternative generation, etc.) can be transferred into the perception and conceptualisation of clinically relevant realities, and discusses the benefits of these changes for clinical practice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article identifies and offers a response to several problems that affect the quality of both clinical education and health care services. These matters are: that in clinical training and practice, health, as lived by patients (persons), is not properly considered, and is equated reductively with treating diseases/disorders; that health is seen through disease, and as restricted to a single model defined by an organism's meeting (or being returned to) biochemical or functional standards; that intellectual assumptions instilled in schools of Medicine and Psychology about realities pertaining to healthcare determine an understanding of chronic illness or life with chronic challenges focused on impairment and suffering, and not on the fuller experience of living with illness, disability or neuropsychological challenges that patients have as persons; that arts-based education reflects the same focus in understanding ‘illness’, and thus neglects giving attention to the creation of personal health states of those living with challenging or debilitating long-term conditions; that, consequently, the arts are instrumentalized to serve these predefined educational purposes, rather than allowed to inform clinical training through that which is intrinsic or more specific to them. As a way out of these limitations and as an illustration of how things could be done differently, Vincent Van Gogh's paintings of the Sunflowers are used as visual inspiration for how we could change the way we see, and construct new mental representations of ‘health’, ‘chronic illness’ or 'chronic challenges', ‘patient as person’ or even 'person as non-patient', ‘the clinician's role’ and ‘the identity of clinical practice’. Relying on Van Gogh's depictions of the sunflowers as an example and a visual basis, the article shows how characteristics typical to art (transformation, alternative generation, etc.) can be transferred into the perception and conceptualisation of clinically relevant realities, and discusses the benefits of these changes for clinical practice.

健康的图片:通过梵高的向日葵看到慢性挑战的健康作为临床观点的必要修订。
本文确定并提供了影响临床教育和卫生保健服务质量的几个问题的响应。这些问题是:在临床培训和实践中,没有适当考虑到病人(人)的健康状况,并将其等同于治疗疾病/失调;健康是通过疾病来看待的,并且被限制在由生物体达到(或恢复)生化或功能标准所定义的单一模式中;医学和心理学学校灌输的关于医疗保健现实的智力假设,决定了对慢性疾病或慢性挑战生活的理解,重点是损伤和痛苦,而不是对患者作为人与疾病、残疾或神经心理挑战生活的更全面的体验;以艺术为基础的教育反映了对理解“疾病”的同样关注,从而忽略了关注那些生活在具有挑战性或衰弱的长期条件下的人的个人健康状况的创造;因此,艺术被用来服务于这些预先定义的教育目的,而不是被允许通过内在的或更具体的方式来告知临床培训。作为摆脱这些限制的一种方式,并作为如何以不同的方式做事情的例证,文森特·梵高的向日葵画被用作视觉灵感,告诉我们如何改变我们看待事物的方式,并构建新的心理表征,如“健康”,“慢性疾病”或“慢性挑战”,“病人作为人”甚至“人作为非病人”,“临床医生的角色”和“临床实践的身份”。本文以梵高对向日葵的描绘为例和视觉基础,展示了如何将艺术的典型特征(转化、替代生成等)转化为对临床相关现实的感知和概念化,并讨论了这些变化对临床实践的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信