Budget impact analyses of hemoglobin A1c and lipid panel point-of-care testing with Afinion™ 2 in Canada and Italy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David Garcia, Antonio Ruffolo, Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Anna Zhou, Emmanuel Lazaridis, Barbara Laurelli
{"title":"Budget impact analyses of hemoglobin A1c and lipid panel point-of-care testing with Afinion™ 2 in Canada and Italy.","authors":"David Garcia, Antonio Ruffolo, Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Anna Zhou, Emmanuel Lazaridis, Barbara Laurelli","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Screening and monitoring of diabetes or dyslipidemia frequently involves a multi-step process requiring patients to obtain test requisitions from their primary care physician (PCP), followed by a laboratory visit and re-consultation. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) and lipid panel can streamline the patient care pathway. This study assessed the budget impact of introducing Afinion™ 2 POCT (Abbott Rapid Diagnostics) from the Canadian and Italian societal perspectives. <b>Methods:</b> Budget impact models were developed for Canada and Italy over a 5-year time horizon (2025 to 2029). The analyses considered the screening and monitoring of diabetes or dyslipidemia for patients utilizing the public healthcare system and attending primary care, and included direct costs (testing, consultations) and indirect costs (productivity loss, transportation) based on published sources. The budget impact (BI) was calculated by comparing scenarios with and without POCT. All costs were adjusted to Canadian dollars ($) or 2024 Euros (€). Scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of alternative assumptions. <b>Results:</b> The 5-year cumulative BI was -$758,006,692 (-$50,709,964 direct, -$707,296,728 indirect) for HbA<sub>1c</sub> POCT and -$726,452,755 ($2,684,011 direct, -$729,136,766 indirect) for lipid panel POCT in Canada and -€1,380,658,764 (-€6,391,954 direct, -€1,374,266,809 indirect) for HbA<sub>1c</sub> POCT and -€851,792,115 (€55,962,879 direct, -€907,754,993 indirect) for lipid panel POCT in Italy. In both countries, cost savings for both the healthcare payer and patients were observed for HbA<sub>1c</sub> POCT, while costs savings were derived from patient indirect costs for lipid panel POCT. The analyses estimated that 1,558,062 and 1,501,260 PCP consultations in Canada, 4,962,338 and 1,951,026 PCP consultations in Italy were avoided with implementation of POCT for HbA<sub>1c</sub> and lipid panel, respectively. Scenario analyses demonstrated potential further cost savings with implementation of POCT in pharmacies. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that the adoption of Afinion 2 POCT for HbA<sub>1c</sub> and lipid panel can provide efficiencies to different types of healthcare systems through reducing PCP consultations, saving time and money for patients and providing cost savings for payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Screening and monitoring of diabetes or dyslipidemia frequently involves a multi-step process requiring patients to obtain test requisitions from their primary care physician (PCP), followed by a laboratory visit and re-consultation. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and lipid panel can streamline the patient care pathway. This study assessed the budget impact of introducing Afinion™ 2 POCT (Abbott Rapid Diagnostics) from the Canadian and Italian societal perspectives. Methods: Budget impact models were developed for Canada and Italy over a 5-year time horizon (2025 to 2029). The analyses considered the screening and monitoring of diabetes or dyslipidemia for patients utilizing the public healthcare system and attending primary care, and included direct costs (testing, consultations) and indirect costs (productivity loss, transportation) based on published sources. The budget impact (BI) was calculated by comparing scenarios with and without POCT. All costs were adjusted to Canadian dollars ($) or 2024 Euros (€). Scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of alternative assumptions. Results: The 5-year cumulative BI was -$758,006,692 (-$50,709,964 direct, -$707,296,728 indirect) for HbA1c POCT and -$726,452,755 ($2,684,011 direct, -$729,136,766 indirect) for lipid panel POCT in Canada and -€1,380,658,764 (-€6,391,954 direct, -€1,374,266,809 indirect) for HbA1c POCT and -€851,792,115 (€55,962,879 direct, -€907,754,993 indirect) for lipid panel POCT in Italy. In both countries, cost savings for both the healthcare payer and patients were observed for HbA1c POCT, while costs savings were derived from patient indirect costs for lipid panel POCT. The analyses estimated that 1,558,062 and 1,501,260 PCP consultations in Canada, 4,962,338 and 1,951,026 PCP consultations in Italy were avoided with implementation of POCT for HbA1c and lipid panel, respectively. Scenario analyses demonstrated potential further cost savings with implementation of POCT in pharmacies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the adoption of Afinion 2 POCT for HbA1c and lipid panel can provide efficiencies to different types of healthcare systems through reducing PCP consultations, saving time and money for patients and providing cost savings for payers.

在加拿大和意大利使用Afinion™2进行糖化血红蛋白和脂质面板即时检测的预算影响分析。
目的:糖尿病或血脂异常的筛查和监测通常涉及一个多步骤的过程,要求患者从他们的初级保健医生(PCP)那里获得测试要求,然后进行实验室访问和重新咨询。即时检测(POCT)的血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)和脂质面板可以简化患者的护理途径。本研究从加拿大和意大利的社会角度评估了引入Afinion™2 POCT(雅培快速诊断)的预算影响。方法:为加拿大和意大利开发了5年(2025年至2029年)的预算影响模型。该分析考虑了利用公共医疗保健系统和参加初级保健的患者的糖尿病或血脂异常的筛查和监测,并包括直接成本(检测,咨询)和间接成本(生产力损失,运输)。预算影响(BI)是通过比较有和没有POCT的方案来计算的。所有费用调整为加元($)或2024欧元(€)。进行情景分析以探讨备选假设的影响。结果:HbA1c POCT的5年累积BI为- 758,006,692美元(- 50,709,964美元直接,- 707,296,728美元间接),加拿大脂质组POCT为- 726,452,755美元(2,684,011美元直接,- 729,136,766美元间接),意大利HbA1c POCT为- 1,380,658,764欧元(- 6,391,954欧元直接,- 1,374,266,809欧元间接),脂质组POCT为- 851,792,115欧元(55,962,879欧元直接,- 907,754,993欧元间接)。在这两个国家,HbA1c POCT均节省了医疗保健支付方和患者的成本,而脂质组POCT的患者间接成本则节省了成本。分析估计,在加拿大,1,558,062和1,501,260次PCP咨询,在意大利,4,962,338和1,951,026次PCP咨询分别通过实施HbA1c和脂质面板POCT而避免。情景分析表明,在药店实施POCT可能会进一步节省成本。结论:本研究表明,采用Afinion 2 POCT进行HbA1c和血脂检查,可以通过减少PCP咨询,为患者节省时间和金钱,为支付方节省成本,为不同类型的医疗保健系统提供效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信