Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Elbow Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s40122-025-00707-9
Ashim Gupta, Filippo Migliorini, Tommaso Bardazzi, Nicola Maffulli
{"title":"Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Elbow Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.","authors":"Ashim Gupta, Filippo Migliorini, Tommaso Bardazzi, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00707-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Elbow ailments are common, but conventional treatment modalities have shortcomings, offering only interim pain relief rather than targeting the underlying pathophysiology. The last two decades have seen a marked increase in the use of autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs), such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), to manage elbow disorders. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the most widely used APBO, but its efficacy remains debatable. Consequently, other APBOs, such as platelet lysate (PL), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), gold-induced cytokine (GOLDIC), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), autologous protein solution (APS), and hyperacute serum (HS), have been considered. Only a few reviews summarize the results of clinical studies investigating the efficacy of these APBOs in elbow disorders. This review documents the results of clinical studies involving APBOs in managing elbow disorders and summarizes the ongoing clinical studies on different clinical trial protocol repositories comprising these APBOs to manage elbow disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. In December 2024, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were accessed with no additional filters or time constraints. All available clinical studies published in English, French, Spanish, German, or Italian concerning the management of elbow disorders by means of APBOs were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three clinical studies met our predefined search and inclusion criteria. In particular, two and one studies involving the use of PL and ACS, respectively, were included in this review. Data from 99 patients were obtained. Of them, 57.6% (57 of 99 patients) were women. The mean length of follow-up was 11.9 ± 0.6 months, and the mean age was 42.0 ± 3.5 years. No complications were reported in any of the studies included. The included studies have low to medium risk of bias, and a very low score on methodological quality. Finally, no clinical studies involving the use of GOLDIC, PRGF, APS or HS were identified, and only one ongoing clinical study involving the use of PL was registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current peer-reviewed published studies demonstrated that administering APBOs, including PL and ACS, might be safe and effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with elbow disorders. Further, high-quality studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"497-511"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00707-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Elbow ailments are common, but conventional treatment modalities have shortcomings, offering only interim pain relief rather than targeting the underlying pathophysiology. The last two decades have seen a marked increase in the use of autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs), such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), to manage elbow disorders. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the most widely used APBO, but its efficacy remains debatable. Consequently, other APBOs, such as platelet lysate (PL), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), gold-induced cytokine (GOLDIC), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), autologous protein solution (APS), and hyperacute serum (HS), have been considered. Only a few reviews summarize the results of clinical studies investigating the efficacy of these APBOs in elbow disorders. This review documents the results of clinical studies involving APBOs in managing elbow disorders and summarizes the ongoing clinical studies on different clinical trial protocol repositories comprising these APBOs to manage elbow disorders.

Methods: This systematic review adhered to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. In December 2024, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were accessed with no additional filters or time constraints. All available clinical studies published in English, French, Spanish, German, or Italian concerning the management of elbow disorders by means of APBOs were considered.

Results: Only three clinical studies met our predefined search and inclusion criteria. In particular, two and one studies involving the use of PL and ACS, respectively, were included in this review. Data from 99 patients were obtained. Of them, 57.6% (57 of 99 patients) were women. The mean length of follow-up was 11.9 ± 0.6 months, and the mean age was 42.0 ± 3.5 years. No complications were reported in any of the studies included. The included studies have low to medium risk of bias, and a very low score on methodological quality. Finally, no clinical studies involving the use of GOLDIC, PRGF, APS or HS were identified, and only one ongoing clinical study involving the use of PL was registered.

Conclusions: The current peer-reviewed published studies demonstrated that administering APBOs, including PL and ACS, might be safe and effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with elbow disorders. Further, high-quality studies are required.

自体外周血源骨科治疗肘部疾病:当前临床证据综述。
肘部疾病是常见的,但传统的治疗方式有缺点,只能提供暂时的疼痛缓解,而不是针对潜在的病理生理。在过去的二十年中,自体外周血源骨科(APBOs),如富血小板血浆(PRP),用于治疗肘部疾病的使用显著增加。富血小板血浆(PRP)是应用最广泛的APBO,但其疗效仍有争议。因此,其他APBOs,如血小板裂解液(PL),自体条件血清(ACS),金诱导细胞因子(GOLDIC),富生长因子血浆(PRGF),自体蛋白溶液(APS)和超急性血清(HS),已被考虑。只有少数综述总结了调查这些APBOs在肘部疾病中的疗效的临床研究结果。这篇综述记录了涉及apbo治疗肘部疾病的临床研究结果,并总结了正在进行的包括这些apbo治疗肘部疾病的不同临床试验方案库的临床研究。方法:本系统评价遵循2020年系统评价和荟萃分析声明指南的首选报告项目。在2024年12月,PubMed, Embase和Web of Science在没有额外过滤器或时间限制的情况下被访问。所有可用的以英语、法语、西班牙语、德语或意大利语发表的关于apbo治疗肘部疾病的临床研究被纳入研究范围。结果:只有三个临床研究符合我们预先设定的检索和纳入标准。特别地,本综述分别纳入了两项和一项涉及使用PL和ACS的研究。获得了99例患者的数据。其中57.6%(99例中57例)为女性。平均随访时间11.9±0.6个月,平均年龄42.0±3.5岁。所有研究均未发现并发症。纳入的研究具有低至中等偏倚风险,方法学质量评分非常低。最后,没有发现使用GOLDIC、PRGF、APS或HS的临床研究,只有一项正在进行的使用PL的临床研究被注册。结论:目前同行评审的已发表的研究表明,给予APBOs,包括PL和ACS,可能安全有效地减轻肘部疾病患者的疼痛和改善功能。此外,还需要进行高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信