{"title":"The role of rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia in the ongoing search for novel antipsychotics.","authors":"Hugo Cano-Ramírez, Kurt Leroy Hoffman","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2025.2459807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia have not progressed beyond targeting dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission. Rodent models of schizophrenia are a necessary tool for elucidating neuropathological processes and testing potential pharmacotherapies, but positive preclinical results in rodent models often do not translate to positive results in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors reviewed PubMed for studies that applied rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia to assess the antipsychotic potential of several novel pharmacotherapies currently under investigation. These included acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse, calcium channel modulators, trace amino acid receptor (TAAR) agonists, and phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors. The authors discuss the extent to which the results of preclinical studies of these drugs in rodent models have predicted clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Although published preclinical studies of these drugs were largely positive, clinical results were often modest or negative. This lack of correspondence is likely due to many factors, including differences in experimental design, poor translation of effective dosing from preclinical to clinical studies, and large inter-individual variation of the human population as compared to laboratory rodents. Closing the gap between preclinical and clinical studies will require strategies aimed at reducing the impact of these factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12267,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2025.2459807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Existing pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia have not progressed beyond targeting dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission. Rodent models of schizophrenia are a necessary tool for elucidating neuropathological processes and testing potential pharmacotherapies, but positive preclinical results in rodent models often do not translate to positive results in the clinic.
Areas covered: The authors reviewed PubMed for studies that applied rodent behavioral models of schizophrenia to assess the antipsychotic potential of several novel pharmacotherapies currently under investigation. These included acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), histamine H3 receptor antagonist/inverse, calcium channel modulators, trace amino acid receptor (TAAR) agonists, and phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A) inhibitors. The authors discuss the extent to which the results of preclinical studies of these drugs in rodent models have predicted clinical efficacy.
Expert opinion: Although published preclinical studies of these drugs were largely positive, clinical results were often modest or negative. This lack of correspondence is likely due to many factors, including differences in experimental design, poor translation of effective dosing from preclinical to clinical studies, and large inter-individual variation of the human population as compared to laboratory rodents. Closing the gap between preclinical and clinical studies will require strategies aimed at reducing the impact of these factors.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (ISSN 1746-0441 [print], 1746-045X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on novel technologies involved in the drug discovery process, leading to new leads and reduced attrition rates. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development.
The Editors welcome:
Reviews covering chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; assay development; novel screening technologies; in vitro/in vivo models; structure-based drug design; systems biology
Drug Case Histories examining the steps involved in the preclinical and clinical development of a particular drug
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, academic pharmaceutical scientists and other closely related professionals looking to enhance the success of their drug candidates through optimisation at the preclinical level.