{"title":"Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia Severity and Toxicity (DITPst): binary classification of drugs by human thrombocytopenia toxicity.","authors":"Xiaolu Nie, Fang Hu, Xiaoling Cheng, Jingyao Ma, Xiaoxia Peng, Feng Sun, Xin Ni, Siyan Zhan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) often occurs in patients during clinical treatment. However, clinicians usually fail to distinguish which drugs can be plausible culprits accurately. We aimed to develop a large comprehensive drug benchmark database with DITP toxicity using the recommended method by FDA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We collected information from six databases that involved drug labeling information, literature, safety signal mining and laboratory testing to generate the annotated drug list with DITP toxicity. Then, we descripted the DITP positive-negative distribution based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) coding system; hotspot analysis was conducted to identify therapeutic categories of drugs within each organ system that warrant attention regarding DITP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DITPst database comprised 1,765 drugs, of which 858 were DITP-positives, whereas 907 were negatives. The investigation of distribution across various therapeutic categories revealed the most frequent DITP-positive categories were immunostimulants (10/11), anti-inflammatory, and antirheumatic products (28/32), and antibacterials for systemic use (102/121). On the contrary, the least frequent DITP-positive therapeutic categories were diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (12/12), pituitary and hypothalamic hormones and analogues (17/18), and drugs for constipation (16/17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We consider the DITPst benchmark database to be an invaluable resource for the community to improve DITP safety research and drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2460439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) often occurs in patients during clinical treatment. However, clinicians usually fail to distinguish which drugs can be plausible culprits accurately. We aimed to develop a large comprehensive drug benchmark database with DITP toxicity using the recommended method by FDA.
Research design and methods: We collected information from six databases that involved drug labeling information, literature, safety signal mining and laboratory testing to generate the annotated drug list with DITP toxicity. Then, we descripted the DITP positive-negative distribution based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) coding system; hotspot analysis was conducted to identify therapeutic categories of drugs within each organ system that warrant attention regarding DITP.
Results: The DITPst database comprised 1,765 drugs, of which 858 were DITP-positives, whereas 907 were negatives. The investigation of distribution across various therapeutic categories revealed the most frequent DITP-positive categories were immunostimulants (10/11), anti-inflammatory, and antirheumatic products (28/32), and antibacterials for systemic use (102/121). On the contrary, the least frequent DITP-positive therapeutic categories were diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (12/12), pituitary and hypothalamic hormones and analogues (17/18), and drugs for constipation (16/17).
Conclusions: We consider the DITPst benchmark database to be an invaluable resource for the community to improve DITP safety research and drug development.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.