CT features with histopathological correlation in inflammatory versus benign & malignant neoplastic appendiceal mucoceles: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kumail Khandwala, Nida Sajjad, Dawar Burhan Khan, Amyn A Malik, Wasim Ahmed Memon, Muhammad Owais Rao, Nasir Ud Din, Faheemullah Khan, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed
{"title":"CT features with histopathological correlation in inflammatory versus benign & malignant neoplastic appendiceal mucoceles: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Kumail Khandwala, Nida Sajjad, Dawar Burhan Khan, Amyn A Malik, Wasim Ahmed Memon, Muhammad Owais Rao, Nasir Ud Din, Faheemullah Khan, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03630-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objectives: </strong>Differentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03630-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Differentiation of histologic subtypes of appendiceal mucoceles may prove to be difficult on computed tomography (CT). The main objective of this study was to identify the CT features of mucocele of the appendix and correlate the imaging findings with histopathology in inflammatory, benign, and malignant neoplastic lesions, and whether these entities can be accurately differentiated on CT imaging.

Materials and methods: CT scans of 31 patients with diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele were retrospectively reviewed and compared with histopathology. The appendix was evaluated for maximal luminal diameter, cystic dilatation, luminal attenuation, appendicolith, mural calcification and enhancement, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid. CT findings were compared by use of Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic utility of appendiceal luminal diameter in differentiating different types of mucoceles.

Results: Patients were classified into three groups: those with inflammatory mucoceles (n = 10), benign mucoceles (simple mucocele, mucosal hyperplasia and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 17), and those with malignant mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 4). The mean diameter was found to be significantly different in the three groups with the largest diameter in the benign subgroup. Soft tissue thickening (p-value 0.01), mural calcification (p-value < 0.01), internal septation (p-value 0.02) and fat stranding (p-value 0.05) was found to be of statistical significance among the various groups. The best cut-off diameter for diagnosis of inflammatory mucoceles to be ≤ 2.3 cm with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 90%.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that CT findings such as appendiceal diameter less than 2.3 cm, absence of soft tissue thickening, mural calcification and internal septation may be useful in preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory appendiceal mucocele.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信