Predicting rapid progression in knee osteoarthritis: a novel and interpretable automated machine learning approach, with specific focus on young patients and early disease.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1136/ard-2024-225872
Simone Castagno, Mark Birch, Mihaela van der Schaar, Andrew McCaskie
{"title":"Predicting rapid progression in knee osteoarthritis: a novel and interpretable automated machine learning approach, with specific focus on young patients and early disease.","authors":"Simone Castagno, Mark Birch, Mihaela van der Schaar, Andrew McCaskie","doi":"10.1136/ard-2024-225872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To facilitate the stratification of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) for new treatment development and clinical trial recruitment, we created an automated machine learning (autoML) tool predicting the rapid progression of knee OA over a 2-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed autoML models integrating clinical, biochemical, X-ray and MRI data. Using two data sets within the OA Initiative-the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health OA Biomarker Consortium for training and hold-out validation, and the Pivotal Osteoarthritis Initiative MRI Analyses study for external validation-we employed two distinct definitions of clinical outcomes: Multiclass (categorising OA progression into pain and/or radiographic) and binary. Key predictors of progression were identified through advanced interpretability techniques, and subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex and ethnicity with a focus on early-stage disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the most reliable models incorporated all available features, simpler models including only clinical variables achieved robust external validation performance, with area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PRC) 0.727 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.728) for multiclass predictions; and AUC-PRC 0.764 (95% CI: 0.762 to 0.766) for binary predictions. Multiclass models performed best in patients with early-stage OA (AUC-PRC 0.724-0.806) whereas binary models were more reliable in patients younger than 60 (AUC-PRC 0.617-0.693). Patient-reported outcomes and MRI features emerged as key predictors of progression, though subgroup differences were noted. Finally, we developed web-based applications to visualise our personalised predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel tool's transparency and reliability in predicting rapid knee OA progression distinguish it from conventional 'black-box' methods and are more likely to facilitate its acceptance by clinicians and patients, enabling effective implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"84 1","pages":"124-135"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-225872","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To facilitate the stratification of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) for new treatment development and clinical trial recruitment, we created an automated machine learning (autoML) tool predicting the rapid progression of knee OA over a 2-year period.

Methods: We developed autoML models integrating clinical, biochemical, X-ray and MRI data. Using two data sets within the OA Initiative-the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health OA Biomarker Consortium for training and hold-out validation, and the Pivotal Osteoarthritis Initiative MRI Analyses study for external validation-we employed two distinct definitions of clinical outcomes: Multiclass (categorising OA progression into pain and/or radiographic) and binary. Key predictors of progression were identified through advanced interpretability techniques, and subgroup analyses were conducted by age, sex and ethnicity with a focus on early-stage disease.

Results: Although the most reliable models incorporated all available features, simpler models including only clinical variables achieved robust external validation performance, with area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PRC) 0.727 (95% CI: 0.726 to 0.728) for multiclass predictions; and AUC-PRC 0.764 (95% CI: 0.762 to 0.766) for binary predictions. Multiclass models performed best in patients with early-stage OA (AUC-PRC 0.724-0.806) whereas binary models were more reliable in patients younger than 60 (AUC-PRC 0.617-0.693). Patient-reported outcomes and MRI features emerged as key predictors of progression, though subgroup differences were noted. Finally, we developed web-based applications to visualise our personalised predictions.

Conclusions: Our novel tool's transparency and reliability in predicting rapid knee OA progression distinguish it from conventional 'black-box' methods and are more likely to facilitate its acceptance by clinicians and patients, enabling effective implementation in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信