Knowledge and understanding of information after taking decision to participate or not in a randomized trial of surgery vs radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced prostate cancer - an observational study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yvonne Brandberg, Olof Akre, Mia Bergenmar
{"title":"Knowledge and understanding of information after taking decision to participate or not in a randomized trial of surgery vs radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced prostate cancer - an observational study.","authors":"Yvonne Brandberg, Olof Akre, Mia Bergenmar","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Informed consent from trial participants is mandatory. In a randomized clinical trial, we investigated (1) differences in knowledge and understanding of trial information between patients who participated and those who refrained, (2) differences in perceptions of information, and (3) differences in satisfaction with the information.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>After the decision about participation in the randomized study, 'Surgery versus radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer' (SPCG-15), patients were sent questionnaires ('Quality of Informed Consent', EORTC QLQ-INFO25). Patients were categorized in 'Non-participants' or 'Participants'.</p><p><strong>Results and interpretation: </strong>A total of 80 patients (80%) responded, 68% of non-participants and 95% of participants. Between-group differences in knowledge were found for duration of the trial, insurances in the trial, and if the trial intervention had been proven to be superior. Patients had high levels of knowledge (> 80%) regarding the trial aim, that participation implied research, the right to decline, that future patients benefit from research and, of the randomization procedure. Less than 50% responded correctly concerning risks associated with the trial, the unproven nature of the trial and issues about insurances. Non-participants scored lower concerning duration of trial participation, confidentiality of medical records, treatments and procedures in the trial, and experimental nature of treatments. There were no differences regarding satisfaction with information. Non-participants and participants did not differ in satisfaction, or in knowledge and understanding of most aspects of the information. Knowledge levels were low in some areas, and thus, it seems to be room for improvement to fulfill the requirements of informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"167-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Informed consent from trial participants is mandatory. In a randomized clinical trial, we investigated (1) differences in knowledge and understanding of trial information between patients who participated and those who refrained, (2) differences in perceptions of information, and (3) differences in satisfaction with the information.

Patients: After the decision about participation in the randomized study, 'Surgery versus radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer' (SPCG-15), patients were sent questionnaires ('Quality of Informed Consent', EORTC QLQ-INFO25). Patients were categorized in 'Non-participants' or 'Participants'.

Results and interpretation: A total of 80 patients (80%) responded, 68% of non-participants and 95% of participants. Between-group differences in knowledge were found for duration of the trial, insurances in the trial, and if the trial intervention had been proven to be superior. Patients had high levels of knowledge (> 80%) regarding the trial aim, that participation implied research, the right to decline, that future patients benefit from research and, of the randomization procedure. Less than 50% responded correctly concerning risks associated with the trial, the unproven nature of the trial and issues about insurances. Non-participants scored lower concerning duration of trial participation, confidentiality of medical records, treatments and procedures in the trial, and experimental nature of treatments. There were no differences regarding satisfaction with information. Non-participants and participants did not differ in satisfaction, or in knowledge and understanding of most aspects of the information. Knowledge levels were low in some areas, and thus, it seems to be room for improvement to fulfill the requirements of informed consent.

在决定参加或不参加局部晚期前列腺癌患者手术与放疗的随机试验后对信息的认识和理解-一项观察性研究
背景和目的:必须获得试验参与者的知情同意。在一项随机临床试验中,我们调查了(1)参加试验的患者与不参加试验的患者对试验信息的知识和理解的差异,(2)对信息的感知差异,(3)对信息的满意度差异。患者:在决定是否参加随机研究“局部晚期前列腺癌的手术与放疗”(SPCG-15)后,向患者发送问卷(“知情同意质量”,EORTC QLQ-INFO25)。患者被分为“非参与者”和“参与者”。结果和解释:共有80名患者(80%)有反应,68%的非参与者和95%的参与者。在试验持续时间、试验保险以及试验干预是否被证明是优越的情况下,发现了组间知识差异。患者对试验目的、参与意味着研究、拒绝的权利、未来的患者从研究中受益以及随机化过程有很高的认识(bbb80 %)。不到50%的人正确回答了与试验相关的风险、试验未经证实的性质和保险问题。非参与者在参与试验的持续时间、医疗记录的保密性、试验中的治疗和程序以及治疗的实验性方面得分较低。在信息满意度方面没有差异。非参与者和参与者在满意度上没有差异,或者在对信息的大多数方面的知识和理解上没有差异。某些领域的知识水平较低,因此,在满足知情同意的要求方面似乎还有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信