Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Social Media Platforms Versus Large Language Models.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004232
Javier Suárez Aguilar, Manuel Viñuela Florido, Julio Mayol, Lara Cristóbal, Andrés A Maldonado
{"title":"Quality of Information in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Social Media Platforms Versus Large Language Models.","authors":"Javier Suárez Aguilar, Manuel Viñuela Florido, Julio Mayol, Lara Cristóbal, Andrés A Maldonado","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment disease, and it is a subject of great interest and concern to medical professionals and the general public. Our study aims to analyze and compare the quality and accuracy of the information related to CTS provided by social media platforms (SMPs) and the new large language models (LLM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On YouTube, the first 20 videos in English and the first 20 videos in Spanish when searching for \"carpal tunnel syndrome\" and \"síndrome túnel carpo\" were selected. On Instagram, the first 20 videos with the hashtag #carpaltunnelsyndrome and #tunelcarpiano were chosen (in total 80 videos). Duration, number of likes, number of views, number of followers, upload date, and author category (medical specialist, patient, etc) were evaluated. Three specific questions about CTS were asked to 2 new LLMs (ChatGPT and Google Bard). The quality of information was analyzed and compared by two independent board-certified plastic surgeons using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) and DISCERN scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LLMs showed a significant higher quality of information when compared with SMPs based on the DISCERN scores ( P < 0.05). Average DISCERN scores for answers given by ChatGPT and Google Bard were 52.83 and 57.83, respectively (good quality). In YouTube and Instagram, the average score for the 80 videos based on the JAMA scale was 1.92 (low reliability) and 25.18 (very low quality) on the DISCERN scale. Videos created by medical professionals in SMPs were associated with a higher JAMA and DISCERN scores ( P < 0.05). 53.8% of the videos were made by a nonmedical author.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quality of information from LLMs was good and significantly better than in SMP. A low participation of board-certified surgeons in SMP was found. Board-certified surgeons should be more involved in LLM and SMPs to increase leadership, improve education, and spread knowledge of peripheral nerve surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"512-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment disease, and it is a subject of great interest and concern to medical professionals and the general public. Our study aims to analyze and compare the quality and accuracy of the information related to CTS provided by social media platforms (SMPs) and the new large language models (LLM).

Methods: On YouTube, the first 20 videos in English and the first 20 videos in Spanish when searching for "carpal tunnel syndrome" and "síndrome túnel carpo" were selected. On Instagram, the first 20 videos with the hashtag #carpaltunnelsyndrome and #tunelcarpiano were chosen (in total 80 videos). Duration, number of likes, number of views, number of followers, upload date, and author category (medical specialist, patient, etc) were evaluated. Three specific questions about CTS were asked to 2 new LLMs (ChatGPT and Google Bard). The quality of information was analyzed and compared by two independent board-certified plastic surgeons using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) and DISCERN scales.

Results: LLMs showed a significant higher quality of information when compared with SMPs based on the DISCERN scores ( P < 0.05). Average DISCERN scores for answers given by ChatGPT and Google Bard were 52.83 and 57.83, respectively (good quality). In YouTube and Instagram, the average score for the 80 videos based on the JAMA scale was 1.92 (low reliability) and 25.18 (very low quality) on the DISCERN scale. Videos created by medical professionals in SMPs were associated with a higher JAMA and DISCERN scores ( P < 0.05). 53.8% of the videos were made by a nonmedical author.

Conclusions: The quality of information from LLMs was good and significantly better than in SMP. A low participation of board-certified surgeons in SMP was found. Board-certified surgeons should be more involved in LLM and SMPs to increase leadership, improve education, and spread knowledge of peripheral nerve surgery.

腕管综合征的信息质量:社交媒体平台与大型语言模型。
简介:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是最常见的周围神经卡压病,是医学界和公众非常感兴趣和关注的课题。我们的研究旨在分析和比较社交媒体平台(SMPs)和新的大型语言模型(LLM)提供的CTS相关信息的质量和准确性。方法:在YouTube上选取搜索“腕管综合征”和“síndrome túnel carpo”的前20个英文视频和前20个西班牙语视频。在Instagram上,前20个带有#carpaltunnelsyndrome和#tunelcarpiano标签的视频被选中(总共80个视频)。评估了持续时间、点赞数、观看数、关注数、上传日期和作者类别(医学专家、患者等)。2名新LLMs (ChatGPT和b谷歌Bard)被问及关于CTS的三个具体问题。信息的质量由两位独立的委员会认证的整形外科医生使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)和辨别量表进行分析和比较。结果:与基于DISCERN评分的smp相比,llm显示出更高的信息质量(P < 0.05)。ChatGPT和b谷歌Bard给出的答案的平均辨别分数分别为52.83和57.83(质量好)。在YouTube和Instagram上,基于JAMA量表的80个视频的平均得分为1.92(低可靠性),在DISCERN量表上的平均得分为25.18(非常低质量)。由医疗专业人员制作的视频与较高的JAMA和DISCERN分数相关(P < 0.05)。53.8%的视频由非医学作者制作。结论:LLMs的信息质量较好,明显优于SMP。委员会认证的外科医生参与SMP的比例较低。委员会认证的外科医生应该更多地参与LLM和smp,以加强领导,改善教育,并传播周围神经外科知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信