The Risk of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty Depends More on Stem Design Than Cement Use: An Analysis of National Health Data from England.

J N Lamb,R M West,S D Relton,J M Wilkinson,H G Pandit
{"title":"The Risk of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty Depends More on Stem Design Than Cement Use: An Analysis of National Health Data from England.","authors":"J N Lamb,R M West,S D Relton,J M Wilkinson,H G Pandit","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIn this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients >70 years of age, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and with femoral neck fracture.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPOPFFs occurred in 0.6% (5,100) of 809,832 cases during a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9 to 9.6 years). After cemented stem implantation, the majority of POPFFs were treated with fixation. Adjusted prosthesis time incidence rates (PTIRs) for POPFFs varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam (CB) stems demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF compared with the current gold standard of a polished taper slip cemented stem.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCemented CB stems were associated with the lowest POPFF risk, and some cementless stem designs outperformed modern cemented stem designs. Stem design was strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when considering femoral implants in those most at risk for POPFF.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In this study, we estimated the risk of surgically treated postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) associated with femoral implants frequently used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS In this cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, POPFFs were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national hospital records. POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders, were estimated for common stems. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients >70 years of age, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and with femoral neck fracture. RESULTS POPFFs occurred in 0.6% (5,100) of 809,832 cases during a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.9 to 9.6 years). After cemented stem implantation, the majority of POPFFs were treated with fixation. Adjusted prosthesis time incidence rates (PTIRs) for POPFFs varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam (CB) stems demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF compared with the current gold standard of a polished taper slip cemented stem. CONCLUSIONS Cemented CB stems were associated with the lowest POPFF risk, and some cementless stem designs outperformed modern cemented stem designs. Stem design was strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when considering femoral implants in those most at risk for POPFF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信