Comparative analysis of risk measures for optimal hedge ratio determination

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Fernanda Maria Müller , Leonardo Teixeira Spindler , Marcelo Brutti Righi
{"title":"Comparative analysis of risk measures for optimal hedge ratio determination","authors":"Fernanda Maria Müller ,&nbsp;Leonardo Teixeira Spindler ,&nbsp;Marcelo Brutti Righi","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.106795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a comparative study of loss and loss-deviation measures for optimal hedge ratio estimation in a minimum-loss and loss-deviation framework. The study encompasses five equity market indices and their futures contracts, covering developed and emerging markets from 2006 to 2024. The results show that the Expected Loss Deviation (ELD) measure leads to an average 94.5% and 82% reduction of variance and Value at Risk (VaR), respectively, thus outperforming other traditional measures, such as Expected Shortfall (ES) and Expectile Value at Risk (EVaR). Risk and loss-deviation measures with significance-level parameters showed increased effectiveness with higher significance levels. This research contributes to the literature by systematically comparing risk measures and highlighting the practical advantages of using loss-deviation measures in optimizing hedging strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 106795"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325000601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a comparative study of loss and loss-deviation measures for optimal hedge ratio estimation in a minimum-loss and loss-deviation framework. The study encompasses five equity market indices and their futures contracts, covering developed and emerging markets from 2006 to 2024. The results show that the Expected Loss Deviation (ELD) measure leads to an average 94.5% and 82% reduction of variance and Value at Risk (VaR), respectively, thus outperforming other traditional measures, such as Expected Shortfall (ES) and Expectile Value at Risk (EVaR). Risk and loss-deviation measures with significance-level parameters showed increased effectiveness with higher significance levels. This research contributes to the literature by systematically comparing risk measures and highlighting the practical advantages of using loss-deviation measures in optimizing hedging strategies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信