Model-based perfusion reconstruction with time separation technique in cone-beam CT dynamic liver perfusion imaging

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1002/mp.17652
Hana Haseljić, Robert Frysch, Vojtěch Kulvait, Thomas Werncke, Inga Brüsch, Oliver Speck, Jessica Schulz, Michael Manhart, Georg Rose
{"title":"Model-based perfusion reconstruction with time separation technique in cone-beam CT dynamic liver perfusion imaging","authors":"Hana Haseljić,&nbsp;Robert Frysch,&nbsp;Vojtěch Kulvait,&nbsp;Thomas Werncke,&nbsp;Inga Brüsch,&nbsp;Oliver Speck,&nbsp;Jessica Schulz,&nbsp;Michael Manhart,&nbsp;Georg Rose","doi":"10.1002/mp.17652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The success of embolization, a minimally invasive treatment of liver cancer, could be evaluated in the operational room with cone-beam CT by acquiring a dynamic perfusion scan to inspect the contrast agent flow.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The reconstruction algorithm must address the issues of low temporal sampling and higher noise levels inherent in cone-beam CT systems, compared to conventional CT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Therefore, a model-based perfusion reconstruction based on the time separation technique (TST) was applied. TST uses basis functions to model time attenuation curves. These functions are either analytical or based on prior knowledge (PK), extracted using singular value decomposition of the classical CT perfusion data of animal subjects. To explore how well the PK can model perfusion dynamics and what the potential limitations are, the dynamic cone-beam CT (CBCT) perfusion scan was simulated from a dynamic CT perfusion scan under different noise levels. The TST method was compared to static reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>It was demonstrated on this simulated dynamic CBCT perfusion scan that a set consisting of only four basis functions results in perfusion maps that preserve relevant information, denoise the data, and outperform static reconstruction under higher noise levels. TST with PK would not only outperform static reconstruction but also the TST with analytical basis functions. Furthermore, it has been shown that only eight CBCT rotations, unlike previously assumed ten, are sufficient to obtain the perfusion maps comparable to the reference CT perfusion maps. This contributes to saving dose and reconstruction time. The real dynamic CBCT perfusion scan, reconstructed under the same conditions as the simulated scan, shows potential for maintaining the accuracy of the perfusion maps. By visual inspection, the embolized region was matching to that in corresponding CT perfusion maps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CBCT reconstruction of perfusion scan data using the TST method has shown promising potential, outperforming static reconstructions and potentially saving dose by reducing the necessary number of acquisition sweeps. Further analysis of a larger cohort of patient data is needed to draw final conclusions regarding the expected advantages of the TST.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 4","pages":"2074-2088"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17652","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The success of embolization, a minimally invasive treatment of liver cancer, could be evaluated in the operational room with cone-beam CT by acquiring a dynamic perfusion scan to inspect the contrast agent flow.

Purpose

The reconstruction algorithm must address the issues of low temporal sampling and higher noise levels inherent in cone-beam CT systems, compared to conventional CT.

Methods

Therefore, a model-based perfusion reconstruction based on the time separation technique (TST) was applied. TST uses basis functions to model time attenuation curves. These functions are either analytical or based on prior knowledge (PK), extracted using singular value decomposition of the classical CT perfusion data of animal subjects. To explore how well the PK can model perfusion dynamics and what the potential limitations are, the dynamic cone-beam CT (CBCT) perfusion scan was simulated from a dynamic CT perfusion scan under different noise levels. The TST method was compared to static reconstruction.

Results

It was demonstrated on this simulated dynamic CBCT perfusion scan that a set consisting of only four basis functions results in perfusion maps that preserve relevant information, denoise the data, and outperform static reconstruction under higher noise levels. TST with PK would not only outperform static reconstruction but also the TST with analytical basis functions. Furthermore, it has been shown that only eight CBCT rotations, unlike previously assumed ten, are sufficient to obtain the perfusion maps comparable to the reference CT perfusion maps. This contributes to saving dose and reconstruction time. The real dynamic CBCT perfusion scan, reconstructed under the same conditions as the simulated scan, shows potential for maintaining the accuracy of the perfusion maps. By visual inspection, the embolized region was matching to that in corresponding CT perfusion maps.

Conclusions

CBCT reconstruction of perfusion scan data using the TST method has shown promising potential, outperforming static reconstructions and potentially saving dose by reducing the necessary number of acquisition sweeps. Further analysis of a larger cohort of patient data is needed to draw final conclusions regarding the expected advantages of the TST.

Abstract Image

基于时间分离技术的模型灌注重建在锥形束CT动态肝脏灌注成像中的应用。
背景:微创肝癌栓塞治疗的成功与否,可在手术室通过锥形束CT动态灌注扫描检查造影剂的流动情况。目的:与传统CT相比,重建算法必须解决锥形束CT系统固有的低时间采样和高噪声水平的问题。方法:采用基于时间分离技术(TST)的模型灌注重建方法。TST使用基函数来模拟时间衰减曲线。这些函数要么是解析的,要么是基于先验知识(PK)的,使用动物受试者经典CT灌注数据的奇异值分解提取。为了探讨PK如何很好地模拟灌注动力学以及潜在的局限性,我们通过不同噪声水平下的动态CT灌注扫描模拟了动态锥束CT (CBCT)灌注扫描。将TST法与静态重建法进行比较。结果:在模拟的动态CBCT灌注扫描中证明,仅由四个基函数组成的灌注图保留了相关信息,对数据进行了去噪,并且在更高噪声水平下优于静态重建。具有PK的TST不仅优于静态重构,而且优于具有分析基函数的TST。此外,研究表明,与之前假设的10次不同,仅8次CBCT旋转就足以获得与参考CT灌注图相当的灌注图。这有助于节省剂量和重建时间。在与模拟扫描相同的条件下重建的真实动态CBCT灌注扫描显示出保持灌注图准确性的潜力。目测栓塞区与相应CT灌注图吻合。结论:使用TST方法重建灌注扫描数据的CBCT显示出良好的潜力,优于静态重建,并可能通过减少必要的采集扫描次数来节省剂量。需要对更大的患者数据队列进行进一步分析,以得出关于TST预期优势的最终结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信