Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review of evidence and future potential

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Fernanda Gushken , Gabriel P.A. Costa , Anderson de Paula Souza , Daniel Heringer , Akhil Anand
{"title":"Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review of evidence and future potential","authors":"Fernanda Gushken ,&nbsp;Gabriel P.A. Costa ,&nbsp;Anderson de Paula Souza ,&nbsp;Daniel Heringer ,&nbsp;Akhil Anand","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) remains a highly effective psychotherapy approach for managing Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), its potential is hindered by workforce shortages and access barriers. In response to these challenges, Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) has emerged as an innovative solution that integrates the core CBT structure with technology. In iCBT, educational materials, therapist communication and progress dashboards can be centralized in a digital format, and delivered in a self-guided, therapist-guided or blended approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this systematic review we aimed to summarize the current evidence of iCBT for AUD. The study performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus in August 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 497 studies that met our search criteria, five high-quality studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies presented a wide variation in the choice of outcomes and in the definition of controls or treatment as usual. When compared to treatment as usual, studies reported non-inferior to superior abstinence results of iCBT for AUD. Overall, most studies favor iCBT use as an adjunct to AUD treatment due to feasibility and access advantages. However, there were limitations identified in recruitment and implementation processes that warrant further studies. The review also showcases how studies on iCBT for AUD often neglect crucial variables such as insurance coverage, digital literacy and health equity. Clinical trials' investigators need to account for economic feasibility and external validity since the method design phase.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>iCBT may be an effective adjunct treatment for AUD. However, further research is required. Research in the field should entail larger trials with standard controls and outcome measures. It is also important to actively recruit participants from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds and adapt iCBT materials to different languages. This will allow a wider population to benefit from the treatment and address existing health disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 209627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) remains a highly effective psychotherapy approach for managing Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), its potential is hindered by workforce shortages and access barriers. In response to these challenges, Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (iCBT) has emerged as an innovative solution that integrates the core CBT structure with technology. In iCBT, educational materials, therapist communication and progress dashboards can be centralized in a digital format, and delivered in a self-guided, therapist-guided or blended approach.

Methods

In this systematic review we aimed to summarize the current evidence of iCBT for AUD. The study performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus in August 2023.

Results

Out of 497 studies that met our search criteria, five high-quality studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies presented a wide variation in the choice of outcomes and in the definition of controls or treatment as usual. When compared to treatment as usual, studies reported non-inferior to superior abstinence results of iCBT for AUD. Overall, most studies favor iCBT use as an adjunct to AUD treatment due to feasibility and access advantages. However, there were limitations identified in recruitment and implementation processes that warrant further studies. The review also showcases how studies on iCBT for AUD often neglect crucial variables such as insurance coverage, digital literacy and health equity. Clinical trials' investigators need to account for economic feasibility and external validity since the method design phase.

Conclusion

iCBT may be an effective adjunct treatment for AUD. However, further research is required. Research in the field should entail larger trials with standard controls and outcome measures. It is also important to actively recruit participants from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds and adapt iCBT materials to different languages. This will allow a wider population to benefit from the treatment and address existing health disparities.
基于互联网的酒精使用障碍认知行为疗法:证据和未来潜力的系统回顾。
导读:虽然认知行为疗法(CBT)仍然是治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的一种非常有效的心理治疗方法,但其潜力受到劳动力短缺和获取障碍的阻碍。为了应对这些挑战,基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)作为一种创新的解决方案出现了,它将CBT的核心结构与技术相结合。在iCBT中,教育材料、治疗师沟通和进度仪表板可以集中在数字格式中,并以自我指导、治疗师指导或混合的方式交付。方法:在这篇系统综述中,我们旨在总结目前iCBT治疗AUD的证据。该研究于2023年8月在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和Scopus上进行了全面的文献检索。结果:在符合检索标准的497项研究中,有5项高质量研究符合我们的纳入标准。这些研究在结果的选择和对照或常规治疗的定义上存在很大差异。与常规治疗相比,研究报告了iCBT治疗AUD的禁欲效果优于iCBT。总的来说,由于可行性和获取优势,大多数研究倾向于将iCBT作为AUD治疗的辅助手段。然而,在征聘和执行过程中发现了一些限制,值得进一步研究。该综述还展示了对澳大利亚人的iCBT研究如何经常忽视保险覆盖、数字素养和健康公平等关键变量。从方法设计阶段开始,临床试验的研究者就需要考虑经济可行性和外部有效性。结论:iCBT可能是治疗AUD的有效辅助手段。然而,还需要进一步的研究。这一领域的研究需要更大规模的试验,采用标准对照和结果测量方法。积极招募来自不同种族和文化背景的参与者,并将iCBT材料改编成不同的语言也很重要。这将使更多的人受益于治疗,并解决现有的健康差距问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信