Significant room for improvement in the prehospital assessment and treatment of acute abdominal pain: a retrospective observational study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Rasmus Bjerén, Carl Magnusson, Johan Herlitz, Denise Bäckström
{"title":"Significant room for improvement in the prehospital assessment and treatment of acute abdominal pain: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Rasmus Bjerén, Carl Magnusson, Johan Herlitz, Denise Bäckström","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01328-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a common reason for calling emergency medical services (EMS). Despite the widely acknowledged importance of effective prehospital pain management, described by patients as crucial regardless of any other factor, studies on prehospital pain management in AAP patients are limited and suggest room for improvement. This is particularly relevant given the long-standing controversy surrounding the use of analgesia in AAP patients before a final diagnosis is made, which may still influence the prehospital pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of pain management in EMS patients with AAP in a central Swedish region. The region had a population density of 15.7 inhabitants per square kilometer spread over a mix of small urban and rural settings. Patient records were manually reviewed and scanned for written assessments or numeric ratings of pain. The analysis focused on proportions of assessment, treatment and reassessment of pain as well as median pain intensity, pain reduction and proportion of patients with a low last recording of pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>816 patients were included. Pain was assessed in 55% (n = 447) of all cases. The median initial pain intensity was eight units (IQR 6.0-9.0) on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and 90% (n = 403) of the assessed patients experienced moderate or severe pain. Of those, 62% (n = 249) received pharmacological treatment. In 50% (n = 158) of all cases receiving treatment, pain was reassessed afterwards. The median pain reduction was four units (IQR 2.0-5.0) on the NRS scale. Among all cases, 10% (n = 84) had a last recorded pain assessment indicating low pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant room for improvement in the prehospital management of acute abdominal pain was found. The proportions of pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were low with nine out of ten patients leaving prehospital care with unknown, moderate or severe pain. Among the cases where pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were made and recorded, four out of five patients experienced significant pain relief, indicating the potential of better prehospital pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01328-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a common reason for calling emergency medical services (EMS). Despite the widely acknowledged importance of effective prehospital pain management, described by patients as crucial regardless of any other factor, studies on prehospital pain management in AAP patients are limited and suggest room for improvement. This is particularly relevant given the long-standing controversy surrounding the use of analgesia in AAP patients before a final diagnosis is made, which may still influence the prehospital pain management.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pain management in EMS patients with AAP in a central Swedish region. The region had a population density of 15.7 inhabitants per square kilometer spread over a mix of small urban and rural settings. Patient records were manually reviewed and scanned for written assessments or numeric ratings of pain. The analysis focused on proportions of assessment, treatment and reassessment of pain as well as median pain intensity, pain reduction and proportion of patients with a low last recording of pain.

Results: 816 patients were included. Pain was assessed in 55% (n = 447) of all cases. The median initial pain intensity was eight units (IQR 6.0-9.0) on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and 90% (n = 403) of the assessed patients experienced moderate or severe pain. Of those, 62% (n = 249) received pharmacological treatment. In 50% (n = 158) of all cases receiving treatment, pain was reassessed afterwards. The median pain reduction was four units (IQR 2.0-5.0) on the NRS scale. Among all cases, 10% (n = 84) had a last recorded pain assessment indicating low pain.

Conclusions: Significant room for improvement in the prehospital management of acute abdominal pain was found. The proportions of pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were low with nine out of ten patients leaving prehospital care with unknown, moderate or severe pain. Among the cases where pain assessment, treatment and reassessment were made and recorded, four out of five patients experienced significant pain relief, indicating the potential of better prehospital pain management.

急性腹痛院前评估和治疗的显著改进空间:一项回顾性观察性研究
背景:急性腹痛(AAP)是呼叫紧急医疗服务(EMS)的常见原因。尽管有效的院前疼痛管理的重要性被广泛认可,患者认为无论其他因素如何,院前疼痛管理在AAP患者中的研究是有限的,并且提出了改进的空间。考虑到长期以来围绕AAP患者在最终诊断前使用镇痛药的争议,这一点尤其重要,这可能仍会影响院前疼痛管理。方法:对瑞典中部地区AAP EMS患者的疼痛管理进行回顾性队列研究。该地区的人口密度为每平方公里15.7人,分布在小城市和农村地区。病人的记录被手工审查和扫描,以进行书面评估或疼痛的数字评级。分析疼痛的评估、治疗和再评估比例,以及中位疼痛强度、疼痛减轻程度和末次疼痛记录低的患者比例。结果:共纳入816例患者。所有病例中有55% (n = 447)进行了疼痛评估。在数值评定量表(NRS)中,初始疼痛强度中位数为8个单位(IQR 6.0-9.0), 90% (n = 403)的被评估患者经历中度或重度疼痛。其中,62% (n = 249)接受了药物治疗。在接受治疗的所有病例中,有50% (n = 158)在治疗后重新评估疼痛。在NRS量表上,疼痛减轻的中位数为4个单位(IQR 2.0-5.0)。在所有病例中,10% (n = 84)的最后记录疼痛评估显示疼痛程度较低。结论:急性腹痛的院前处理有很大的改进空间。疼痛评估、治疗和再评估的比例较低,10名患者中有9名离开院前护理时疼痛不明,中度或重度疼痛。在进行疼痛评估、治疗和再评估并记录的病例中,五分之四的患者疼痛明显缓解,这表明院前疼痛管理可能会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信