Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Treatment Planning for Clinicians Who Treat Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Juanita C Perkins, Ragan Johnson, Shana Williams Davis
{"title":"Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Treatment Planning for Clinicians Who Treat Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"Juanita C Perkins, Ragan Johnson, Shana Williams Davis","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling clinicians and patients to make health care decisions as partners. However, its implementation in mental health care has been a slow process. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study was to implement SDM during outpatient mental health treatment planning. <b>Methods:</b> In an integrated health care clinic, mental health clinicians (<i>n</i> = 4) participated in SDM training to increase their use of SDM. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Physician Version (SDM-Q9-DOC) tool was used in a pre-post design to evaluate the training's effectiveness in increasing the implementation of SDM during treatment planning. <b>Results:</b> SDM-Q9-DOC scores improved from a median of 49-54, suggesting a clinically significant improvement in SDM implementation. Project limitations included short duration and lack of feedback from clinicians and patients about their SDM experience. <b>Conclusions:</b> While guided SDM training can increase the use of SDM in outpatient mental health care, we acknowledge the existing barriers to its implementation. These barriers, including clinician pessimism, time constraints, lack of appropriate decision aids, and workplace expectations, should be further studied and addressed to enhance the implementation of SDM in the mental health setting. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> Psychiatric nurse practitioners and registered nurses can assist with implementing SDM by encouraging effective communication between clinicians and behavioral health clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling clinicians and patients to make health care decisions as partners. However, its implementation in mental health care has been a slow process. Objective: The objective of the study was to implement SDM during outpatient mental health treatment planning. Methods: In an integrated health care clinic, mental health clinicians (n = 4) participated in SDM training to increase their use of SDM. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire Physician Version (SDM-Q9-DOC) tool was used in a pre-post design to evaluate the training's effectiveness in increasing the implementation of SDM during treatment planning. Results: SDM-Q9-DOC scores improved from a median of 49-54, suggesting a clinically significant improvement in SDM implementation. Project limitations included short duration and lack of feedback from clinicians and patients about their SDM experience. Conclusions: While guided SDM training can increase the use of SDM in outpatient mental health care, we acknowledge the existing barriers to its implementation. These barriers, including clinician pessimism, time constraints, lack of appropriate decision aids, and workplace expectations, should be further studied and addressed to enhance the implementation of SDM in the mental health setting. Implications for Nursing: Psychiatric nurse practitioners and registered nurses can assist with implementing SDM by encouraging effective communication between clinicians and behavioral health clients.

将共同决策整合到治疗严重精神疾病患者的临床医生的治疗计划中。
背景:共享决策(SDM)通过使临床医生和患者作为合作伙伴做出医疗保健决策,具有显著改善患者预后的潜力。然而,它在精神卫生保健中的实施一直是一个缓慢的过程。目的:在门诊心理健康治疗计划中实施SDM。方法:在一家综合卫生保健诊所,对4名心理健康临床医生进行SDM培训,以提高他们对SDM的使用。采用9项共享决策问卷医师版(SDM- q9 - doc)工具进行岗前设计,评估培训在提高SDM在治疗计划实施中的有效性。结果:SDM- q9 - doc评分中位数从49-54分提高,表明SDM实施有临床意义的改善。项目的局限性包括持续时间短,缺乏临床医生和患者对其SDM经验的反馈。结论:虽然有指导的SDM培训可以增加SDM在门诊精神卫生保健中的使用,但我们承认其实施存在障碍。这些障碍,包括临床医生的悲观、时间限制、缺乏适当的决策辅助和工作场所的期望,应该进一步研究和解决,以加强SDM在心理健康环境中的实施。对护理的启示:精神科执业护士和注册护士可以通过鼓励临床医生和行为健康客户之间的有效沟通来协助实施SDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信