Colin Birkenbihl, Madison Cuppels, Rory T Boyle, Hannah M Klinger, Oliver Langford, Gillian T Coughlan, Michael J Properzi, Jasmeer Chhatwal, Julie C Price, Aaron P Schultz, Dorene M Rentz, Rebecca E Amariglio, Keith A Johnson, Rebecca F Gottesman, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Paul Maruff, Yen Ying Lim, Colin L Masters, Alexa Beiser, Susan M Resnick, Timothy M Hughes, Samantha Burnham, Ilke Tunali, Susan Landau, Ann D Cohen, Sterling C Johnson, Tobey J Betthauser, Sudha Seshadri, Samuel N Lockhart, Sid E O'Bryant, Prashanthi Vemuri, Reisa A Sperling, Timothy J Hohman, Michael C Donohue, Rachel F Buckley
{"title":"Rethinking the residual approach: leveraging statistical learning to operationalize cognitive resilience in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Colin Birkenbihl, Madison Cuppels, Rory T Boyle, Hannah M Klinger, Oliver Langford, Gillian T Coughlan, Michael J Properzi, Jasmeer Chhatwal, Julie C Price, Aaron P Schultz, Dorene M Rentz, Rebecca E Amariglio, Keith A Johnson, Rebecca F Gottesman, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Paul Maruff, Yen Ying Lim, Colin L Masters, Alexa Beiser, Susan M Resnick, Timothy M Hughes, Samantha Burnham, Ilke Tunali, Susan Landau, Ann D Cohen, Sterling C Johnson, Tobey J Betthauser, Sudha Seshadri, Samuel N Lockhart, Sid E O'Bryant, Prashanthi Vemuri, Reisa A Sperling, Timothy J Hohman, Michael C Donohue, Rachel F Buckley","doi":"10.1186/s40708-024-00249-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive resilience (CR) describes the phenomenon of individuals evading cognitive decline despite prominent Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Operationalization and measurement of this latent construct is non-trivial as it cannot be directly observed. The residual approach has been widely applied to estimate CR, where the degree of resilience is estimated through a linear model's residuals. We demonstrate that this approach makes specific, uncontrollable assumptions and likely leads to biased and erroneous resilience estimates. This is especially true when information about CR is contained in the data the linear model was fitted to, either through inclusion of CR-associated variables or due to correlation. We propose an alternative strategy which overcomes the standard approach's limitations using machine learning principles. Our proposed approach makes fewer assumptions about the data and CR and achieves better estimation accuracy on simulated ground-truth data.</p>","PeriodicalId":37465,"journal":{"name":"Brain Informatics","volume":"12 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-024-00249-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cognitive resilience (CR) describes the phenomenon of individuals evading cognitive decline despite prominent Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. Operationalization and measurement of this latent construct is non-trivial as it cannot be directly observed. The residual approach has been widely applied to estimate CR, where the degree of resilience is estimated through a linear model's residuals. We demonstrate that this approach makes specific, uncontrollable assumptions and likely leads to biased and erroneous resilience estimates. This is especially true when information about CR is contained in the data the linear model was fitted to, either through inclusion of CR-associated variables or due to correlation. We propose an alternative strategy which overcomes the standard approach's limitations using machine learning principles. Our proposed approach makes fewer assumptions about the data and CR and achieves better estimation accuracy on simulated ground-truth data.
期刊介绍:
Brain Informatics is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary open-access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen, which provides a unique platform for researchers and practitioners to disseminate original research on computational and informatics technologies related to brain. This journal addresses the computational, cognitive, physiological, biological, physical, ecological and social perspectives of brain informatics. It also welcomes emerging information technologies and advanced neuro-imaging technologies, such as big data analytics and interactive knowledge discovery related to various large-scale brain studies and their applications. This journal will publish high-quality original research papers, brief reports and critical reviews in all theoretical, technological, clinical and interdisciplinary studies that make up the field of brain informatics and its applications in brain-machine intelligence, brain-inspired intelligent systems, mental health and brain disorders, etc. The scope of papers includes the following five tracks: Track 1: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Brain Science Track 2: Human Information Processing Systems Track 3: Brain Big Data Analytics, Curation and Management Track 4: Informatics Paradigms for Brain and Mental Health Research Track 5: Brain-Machine Intelligence and Brain-Inspired Computing