Ilaria Proietti, Elena De Falco, Luca Pacini, Alessandra Spagnoli, Velia Melone, Vincenzo Petrozza, Claudio Di Cristofano, Giorgio Mangino, Giovanna Romeo, Paolo Rosa, Antonella Calogero, Concetta Potenza
{"title":"BRAF-mutant melanoma management: a single center retrospective analysis of patients treated with sequential therapy.","authors":"Ilaria Proietti, Elena De Falco, Luca Pacini, Alessandra Spagnoli, Velia Melone, Vincenzo Petrozza, Claudio Di Cristofano, Giorgio Mangino, Giovanna Romeo, Paolo Rosa, Antonella Calogero, Concetta Potenza","doi":"10.1080/20450885.2024.2432826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In treating patients with melanoma, the order in which therapy is administered, choosing between targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition, has garnered growing interest.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of patients with advanced melanoma undergoing immunotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line at a single center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients diagnosed with melanoma were identified. At 7 years, in this cohort, 68.4% (95% CI: 55.9%-83.6%) of patients were alive. In all, 47 tumors harbored BRAF mutations; 10 patients who did not receive therapy were excluded from this subgroup. Of the 37 patients with a BRAF mutation, 29 received first-line targeted therapy and 8 received first-line immunotherapy. At 2 years, 28 (76%) patients were alive and 9 (24%) had died. Of the 28 survivors, 22 received first-line targeted therapy and 6 received first-line immunotherapy. In addition, 29 patients were administered a MEK inhibitor in first line. Of these, 66.4% (95% CI: 48.3-91.2) of patients were alive at 7 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between survival and first-line immunotherapy or first-line targeted therapy. Additional studies are required to establish whether front-line immunotherapy is linked to more effective long-term disease control compared to first-line targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"2432826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20450885.2024.2432826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: In treating patients with melanoma, the order in which therapy is administered, choosing between targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition, has garnered growing interest.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of patients with advanced melanoma undergoing immunotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line at a single center.
Results: A total of 88 patients diagnosed with melanoma were identified. At 7 years, in this cohort, 68.4% (95% CI: 55.9%-83.6%) of patients were alive. In all, 47 tumors harbored BRAF mutations; 10 patients who did not receive therapy were excluded from this subgroup. Of the 37 patients with a BRAF mutation, 29 received first-line targeted therapy and 8 received first-line immunotherapy. At 2 years, 28 (76%) patients were alive and 9 (24%) had died. Of the 28 survivors, 22 received first-line targeted therapy and 6 received first-line immunotherapy. In addition, 29 patients were administered a MEK inhibitor in first line. Of these, 66.4% (95% CI: 48.3-91.2) of patients were alive at 7 years.
Conclusions: There was no significant difference between survival and first-line immunotherapy or first-line targeted therapy. Additional studies are required to establish whether front-line immunotherapy is linked to more effective long-term disease control compared to first-line targeted therapy.
期刊介绍:
Skin cancer is on the rise. According to the World Health Organization, 132,000 melanoma skin cancers occur globally each year. While early-stage melanoma is usually relatively easy to treat, once disease spreads prognosis worsens considerably. Therefore, research into combating advanced-stage melanoma is a high priority. New and emerging therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, B-RAF and KIT inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents and novel chemotherapy approaches hold promise for prolonging survival, but the search for a cure is ongoing. Melanoma Management publishes high-quality peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of melanoma, from prevention to diagnosis and from treatment of early-stage disease to late-stage melanoma and metastasis. The journal presents the latest research findings in melanoma research and treatment, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. Key topics covered include: Risk factors, prevention and sun safety education Diagnosis, staging and grading Surgical excision of melanoma lesions Sentinel lymph node biopsy Biological therapies, including immunotherapy and vaccination Novel chemotherapy options Treatment of metastasis Prevention of recurrence Patient care and quality of life.