Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Jessica Baillie, Ann Bonner, Sonia Guillouet, Cornelia Mikut, Sally Punzalan, Anna Kaczmarek, Lawrence Climaco Wenzyl, Jeanette Finderup
{"title":"Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design","authors":"Jessica Baillie,&nbsp;Ann Bonner,&nbsp;Sonia Guillouet,&nbsp;Cornelia Mikut,&nbsp;Sally Punzalan,&nbsp;Anna Kaczmarek,&nbsp;Lawrence Climaco Wenzyl,&nbsp;Jeanette Finderup","doi":"10.1111/jorc.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nursing sensitive indicators are a way of measuring aspects of patient care that are most affected by the actions of the nurse. Despite the existence of nursing sensitive indicators, these are largely not suitable to measure peritoneal dialysis nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This project aimed to co-develop a set of peritoneal dialysis nursing-sensitive indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Informed by the Donabedian quality framework (structure, process, outcome), a multinational co-production consensus design was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants and Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>First, an expert panel of seven professionals proposed potential indicators from clinical expertise and examining peer-reviewed articles and clinical guidelines. Next, the expert panel undertook a consensus building process involving face-to-face meetings and online discussion to refine the indicators. Lastly indicator confirmation was undertaken using a 5-point rating scale involving delegates at a major conference.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The initial indicator proposal, based on evidence and clinical experience, identified 65 potential indicators (20 structural, 22 process and 23 outcome). The consensus process involved discussion and negotiation to reduce the potential indicators to 28 (eight structural, 12 process and eight outcome). Confirmation involved 25 nurses with all 28 indicators supported (all &gt; 3.5/5). Indicators highly supported were patient satisfaction, fluid balance assessment, peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site, clinical signs measurement, peritonitis investigation, peritoneal dialysis catheter complications referral and infection rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Following further validity, reliability and feasibility testing, these nursing sensitive indicators can be used to measure the quality of peritoneal dialysis nursing care provided for patients and families.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing sensitive indicators are a way of measuring aspects of patient care that are most affected by the actions of the nurse. Despite the existence of nursing sensitive indicators, these are largely not suitable to measure peritoneal dialysis nursing practice.

Objective

This project aimed to co-develop a set of peritoneal dialysis nursing-sensitive indicators.

Design

Informed by the Donabedian quality framework (structure, process, outcome), a multinational co-production consensus design was used.

Participants and Measurements

First, an expert panel of seven professionals proposed potential indicators from clinical expertise and examining peer-reviewed articles and clinical guidelines. Next, the expert panel undertook a consensus building process involving face-to-face meetings and online discussion to refine the indicators. Lastly indicator confirmation was undertaken using a 5-point rating scale involving delegates at a major conference.

Results

The initial indicator proposal, based on evidence and clinical experience, identified 65 potential indicators (20 structural, 22 process and 23 outcome). The consensus process involved discussion and negotiation to reduce the potential indicators to 28 (eight structural, 12 process and eight outcome). Confirmation involved 25 nurses with all 28 indicators supported (all > 3.5/5). Indicators highly supported were patient satisfaction, fluid balance assessment, peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site, clinical signs measurement, peritonitis investigation, peritoneal dialysis catheter complications referral and infection rates.

Conclusion

Following further validity, reliability and feasibility testing, these nursing sensitive indicators can be used to measure the quality of peritoneal dialysis nursing care provided for patients and families.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信