Multi-level Factors to Build Confidence and Support in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09345-x
Jason C Chen, Lalita Subramanian, Ted A Skolarus, Sarah T Hawley, Aaron Rankin, Michael D Fetters, Karla Witzke, Tudor Borza, Archana Radhakrishnan
{"title":"Multi-level Factors to Build Confidence and Support in Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Jason C Chen, Lalita Subramanian, Ted A Skolarus, Sarah T Hawley, Aaron Rankin, Michael D Fetters, Karla Witzke, Tudor Borza, Archana Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09345-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Active surveillance (AS) is the guideline-recommended treatment for low-risk prostate cancer and involves routine provider visits, lab tests, imaging, and prostate biopsies. Despite good uptake, adherence to AS, in terms of receiving recommended follow-up testing and remaining on AS in the absence of evidence of cancer progression, remains challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to better understand urologist, primary care providers (PCPs), and patient experiences with AS care delivery to identify opportunities to improve adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study involving patients, PCPs, and urologists with experience of AS.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>PCPs (19), urologists (15), and patients (15) in Michigan.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Participants were recruited through a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually from June 2020 to April 2021. The Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel's Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model guided interviews and coding. Thematic analysis was used to identify shared perspectives on AS care delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes emerged from the PCP, urologist, and patient data collected related to AS care delivery that were needed to improve AS adherence: (1) building patient confidence in AS by leveraging provider roles and expertise and creating connection through communication across the care team and with patients; (2) building confidence in AS through psychosocial support by involving families and peers, and addressing anxiety and uncertainty; (3) building AS support within healthcare processes and electronic health record systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These themes reflect opportunities for interventions at the care team, community (family and peers), and health system levels that could better support individualized care and overcome challenges to AS adherence through team-based approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1107-1115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09345-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is the guideline-recommended treatment for low-risk prostate cancer and involves routine provider visits, lab tests, imaging, and prostate biopsies. Despite good uptake, adherence to AS, in terms of receiving recommended follow-up testing and remaining on AS in the absence of evidence of cancer progression, remains challenging.

Objective: We sought to better understand urologist, primary care providers (PCPs), and patient experiences with AS care delivery to identify opportunities to improve adherence.

Design: A qualitative study involving patients, PCPs, and urologists with experience of AS.

Participants: PCPs (19), urologists (15), and patients (15) in Michigan.

Approach: Participants were recruited through a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually from June 2020 to April 2021. The Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel's Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model guided interviews and coding. Thematic analysis was used to identify shared perspectives on AS care delivery.

Results: Three main themes emerged from the PCP, urologist, and patient data collected related to AS care delivery that were needed to improve AS adherence: (1) building patient confidence in AS by leveraging provider roles and expertise and creating connection through communication across the care team and with patients; (2) building confidence in AS through psychosocial support by involving families and peers, and addressing anxiety and uncertainty; (3) building AS support within healthcare processes and electronic health record systems.

Conclusion: These themes reflect opportunities for interventions at the care team, community (family and peers), and health system levels that could better support individualized care and overcome challenges to AS adherence through team-based approaches.

在低风险前列腺癌主动监测中建立信心和支持的多层次因素:定性研究。
背景:主动监测(AS)是指南推荐的低风险前列腺癌治疗方法,包括常规就诊、实验室检查、影像学检查和前列腺活检。尽管吸收良好,但就接受推荐的随访测试和在没有癌症进展证据的情况下继续使用AS而言,坚持使用AS仍然具有挑战性。目的:我们试图更好地了解泌尿科医生、初级保健提供者(pcp)和AS护理交付的患者经验,以确定提高依从性的机会。设计:一项涉及患者、pcp和有AS经验的泌尿科医生的定性研究。参与者:密歇根州的pcp(19),泌尿科医生(15)和患者(15)。方法:参与者是通过全州范围内的质量改进协作来招募的。半结构化访谈于2020年6月至2021年4月进行。理论领域框架和行为改变之轮的能力、机会和动机模型指导了访谈和编码。主题分析用于确定对AS护理提供的共同观点。结果:从PCP、泌尿科医生和收集的与AS护理提供相关的患者数据中得出了三个主要主题,这些主题需要提高AS的依从性:(1)通过利用提供者的角色和专业知识建立患者对AS的信心,并通过整个护理团队和患者之间的沟通建立联系;(2)通过家庭和同伴参与的社会心理支持,解决焦虑和不确定性,建立对AS的信心;(3)在医疗流程和电子健康记录系统中建立AS支持。结论:这些主题反映了护理团队、社区(家庭和同伴)和卫生系统层面的干预机会,这些干预可以更好地支持个性化护理,并通过基于团队的方法克服AS依从性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信