Time for educational Revamp? A Nationwide Survey of Fellowships in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Program Directors' and Fellows' Didactic Experiences.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Merima Ruhotina, Colleen Murphy, Elizabeth Rasmussen, Joan Skelly, Masoud Azodi, Shabnam Kashani
{"title":"Time for educational Revamp? A Nationwide Survey of Fellowships in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Program Directors' and Fellows' Didactic Experiences.","authors":"Merima Ruhotina, Colleen Murphy, Elizabeth Rasmussen, Joan Skelly, Masoud Azodi, Shabnam Kashani","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>A desire for curriculum standardization in obstetrics and gynecology residencies has been identified. No prior investigations of educational experience in fellowships in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (FMIGS) programs have been completed. This study aimed to determine the state of the FMIGS didactic education and the perceptions of fellowship directors and fellows regarding a standardized curriculum.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Web-based survey platform.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>AAGL FMIGS program directors and fellows.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Eighty-seven of the 151 fellowship directors responded to the survey, resulting in a response rate of 57.6%. Fifty-eight the 97 fellows responded to the survey, for a response rate of 59.8%. When participants were asked whether their programs had structured didactic education curricula, 98.9% of fellowship directors replied yes, whereas only 77.6% of fellows responded yes (p <.001). Approximately 97% of fellowship directors reported that structured didactic time was protected from clinical duties. However, only 67.2% of the participants reported that didactic time was protected (p <.001). Participants (71.3% of the fellowship directors and 84.5% of the fellows) strongly agreed that their didactic education could be improved. A large majority of the participants agreed that all MIGS fellows should learn the same content in their didactic curricula, that fellows should have access to the same educational resources, and that participating in a standardized didactic curriculum would allow for a better transition into independent practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fellowship directors and fellows are aligned with their desire to improve their current didactic education programs and the need for a centrally located, structured, and standardized fellowship education curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: A desire for curriculum standardization in obstetrics and gynecology residencies has been identified. No prior investigations of educational experience in fellowships in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (FMIGS) programs have been completed. This study aimed to determine the state of the FMIGS didactic education and the perceptions of fellowship directors and fellows regarding a standardized curriculum.

Design: National survey.

Setting: Web-based survey platform.

Participants: AAGL FMIGS program directors and fellows.

Interventions: N/A.

Measurements and main results: Eighty-seven of the 151 fellowship directors responded to the survey, resulting in a response rate of 57.6%. Fifty-eight the 97 fellows responded to the survey, for a response rate of 59.8%. When participants were asked whether their programs had structured didactic education curricula, 98.9% of fellowship directors replied yes, whereas only 77.6% of fellows responded yes (p <.001). Approximately 97% of fellowship directors reported that structured didactic time was protected from clinical duties. However, only 67.2% of the participants reported that didactic time was protected (p <.001). Participants (71.3% of the fellowship directors and 84.5% of the fellows) strongly agreed that their didactic education could be improved. A large majority of the participants agreed that all MIGS fellows should learn the same content in their didactic curricula, that fellows should have access to the same educational resources, and that participating in a standardized didactic curriculum would allow for a better transition into independent practice.

Conclusion: Fellowship directors and fellows are aligned with their desire to improve their current didactic education programs and the need for a centrally located, structured, and standardized fellowship education curriculum.

研究目的:妇产科住院医师培训课程需要标准化。此前尚未完成对妇科微创手术(FMIGS)项目研究员教育经验的调查。本研究的目的是确定微创妇科手术(FMIGS)教学的现状,以及研究金主任和研究员对标准化课程的看法:设计:全国调查设置:基于网络的调查平台 参与者:AAGL FMIGS项目主任和研究员:结果:151 位研究金主任中有 87 位对调查做出了回应,回应率为 57.6%。在 97 名研究员中,共有 58 人回复了调查,回复率为 59.8%。当参与者被问及他们的项目是否有结构化的教学教育课程时,98.9%的研究金主任回答有,而只有77.6%的研究员回答有(P结论:研究员主任和研究员一致希望改善目前的教学教育计划,并需要一个集中、结构化和标准化的研究员教育课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信