Defining and responding to the contextual drivers for implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in 14 neonatal units in South Africa.

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae222
Dena Van Den Bergh, Esmita Charani, Angela Dramowski, Ama Sakoa Annor, Michelle Gijzelaar, Angeliki Messina, Andriette Van Jaarsveld, Debra A Goff, Pavel Prusakov, Liezl Balfour, Adrie Bekker, Azraa Cassim, Nelesh P Govender, Sandi L Holgate, Sonya Kolman, Hafsah Tootla, Natalie Schellack, Kessendri Reddy, Christine Fisher, Lucinda Conradie, Anika Van Niekerk, Anje Laubscher, Pearl Alexander, Thanusha Naidoo, Magdel Dippenaar, Colleen Bamford, Sharnel Brits, Pinky Chirwa, Hannelie Erasmus, Pieter Ekermans, Lerina Rungen, Teresa Kriel, Dini Mawela, Simthembile Mjekula, Maphoshane Nchabeleng, Ronald Nhari, Marli Janse Van Rensburg, Pablo J Sánchez, Adrian Brink
{"title":"Defining and responding to the contextual drivers for implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in 14 neonatal units in South Africa.","authors":"Dena Van Den Bergh, Esmita Charani, Angela Dramowski, Ama Sakoa Annor, Michelle Gijzelaar, Angeliki Messina, Andriette Van Jaarsveld, Debra A Goff, Pavel Prusakov, Liezl Balfour, Adrie Bekker, Azraa Cassim, Nelesh P Govender, Sandi L Holgate, Sonya Kolman, Hafsah Tootla, Natalie Schellack, Kessendri Reddy, Christine Fisher, Lucinda Conradie, Anika Van Niekerk, Anje Laubscher, Pearl Alexander, Thanusha Naidoo, Magdel Dippenaar, Colleen Bamford, Sharnel Brits, Pinky Chirwa, Hannelie Erasmus, Pieter Ekermans, Lerina Rungen, Teresa Kriel, Dini Mawela, Simthembile Mjekula, Maphoshane Nchabeleng, Ronald Nhari, Marli Janse Van Rensburg, Pablo J Sánchez, Adrian Brink","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the contextual drivers of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme interventions in neonatal units is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a prospective mixed-methods multidisciplinary neonatal AMS (NeoAMS) interventional study in 14 South African hospitals, we applied a three-phased process to assess implementation barriers and contextual drivers experienced by participating health professionals. The study included: (Phase one; P1) a survey of pre-intervention barriers and enablers; (P2) written feedback during the study intervention phase; and (P3) semi-structured exit interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents to the P1 survey (<i>n</i> = 100) identified 15 barriers, 9 in the domain of personnel resources, including staffing, time and workload constraints. Other barriers related to limited access to antimicrobial use and surveillance trends, complexity of neonatal care, absence of multidisciplinary team (MDT) AMS and change resistance. For P2, written feedback during implementation (<i>n</i> = 42) confirmed that the MDT approach facilitated systems changes, including policy adaptations, process improvements, strengthened infection control practices, and expansion of AMS MDT roles. MDT benefits were described as aligned team purpose, improved communication, and knowledge sharing. Reported challenges included time to meet and building trust. In P3 interviews (<i>n</i> = 42), improved interpersonal communication, trust, personal growth and confidence building were cited as highlights of working in multidisciplinary AMS teams. Extending the MDT approach to other hospitals, training more health professionals in AMS and increasing management involvement were identified as priorities going forward.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the organizational and interprofessional context for NeoAMS implementation enabled an MDT approach to develop and optimize neonatal AMS with potential for adoption in similar resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 1","pages":"dlae222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on the contextual drivers of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme interventions in neonatal units is limited.

Methods: As part of a prospective mixed-methods multidisciplinary neonatal AMS (NeoAMS) interventional study in 14 South African hospitals, we applied a three-phased process to assess implementation barriers and contextual drivers experienced by participating health professionals. The study included: (Phase one; P1) a survey of pre-intervention barriers and enablers; (P2) written feedback during the study intervention phase; and (P3) semi-structured exit interviews.

Results: Respondents to the P1 survey (n = 100) identified 15 barriers, 9 in the domain of personnel resources, including staffing, time and workload constraints. Other barriers related to limited access to antimicrobial use and surveillance trends, complexity of neonatal care, absence of multidisciplinary team (MDT) AMS and change resistance. For P2, written feedback during implementation (n = 42) confirmed that the MDT approach facilitated systems changes, including policy adaptations, process improvements, strengthened infection control practices, and expansion of AMS MDT roles. MDT benefits were described as aligned team purpose, improved communication, and knowledge sharing. Reported challenges included time to meet and building trust. In P3 interviews (n = 42), improved interpersonal communication, trust, personal growth and confidence building were cited as highlights of working in multidisciplinary AMS teams. Extending the MDT approach to other hospitals, training more health professionals in AMS and increasing management involvement were identified as priorities going forward.

Conclusions: Understanding the organizational and interprofessional context for NeoAMS implementation enabled an MDT approach to develop and optimize neonatal AMS with potential for adoption in similar resource-constrained settings.

确定南非 14 个新生儿科室实施抗菌药物管理的背景驱动因素并采取应对措施。
背景:在新生儿单位的抗菌素管理(AMS)规划干预措施的背景驱动因素的研究是有限的。方法:作为一项在14家南非医院进行的前瞻性混合方法多学科新生儿AMS (NeoAMS)介入研究的一部分,我们采用了三个阶段的过程来评估参与的卫生专业人员遇到的实施障碍和背景驱动因素。研究包括:(第一阶段;P1)干预前障碍和促进因素的调查;(P2)研究干预阶段的书面反馈;(P3)半结构化离职面谈。结果:P1调查的受访者(n = 100)确定了15个障碍,其中9个在人力资源领域,包括人员配置、时间和工作量限制。其他障碍与获得抗微生物药物使用和监测趋势有限、新生儿护理的复杂性、缺乏多学科团队(MDT) AMS和变化耐药性有关。对于P2,在实施过程中的书面反馈(n = 42)证实,MDT方法促进了系统变化,包括政策调整、流程改进、加强感染控制实践和扩大AMS MDT作用。MDT的好处被描述为一致的团队目标、改进的沟通和知识共享。报告的挑战包括会面和建立信任的时间。在P3访谈中(n = 42),改善人际沟通、信任、个人成长和建立信心被认为是在多学科AMS团队中工作的亮点。将MDT方法推广到其他医院、培训更多医疗辅助队的保健专业人员和增加管理人员的参与被确定为今后的优先事项。结论:了解新生儿AMS实施的组织和跨专业背景,使MDT方法能够开发和优化新生儿AMS,并有可能在类似的资源受限环境中采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信