Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Eva Futtrup Maksten, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Marianne Tang Severinsen, Eldad J Dann, Henrik Frederiksen, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Judit Mészáros Jørgensen, Michael Roost Clausen, Jørn Starklint, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Joachim Baech
{"title":"Similar Survival Between Non-Western Immigrant Patients and Danish-Born Patients with Lymphoma: A Danish Population-Based Study.","authors":"Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Eva Futtrup Maksten, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Marianne Tang Severinsen, Eldad J Dann, Henrik Frederiksen, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Judit Mészáros Jørgensen, Michael Roost Clausen, Jørn Starklint, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Joachim Baech","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S484797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This nationwide Danish cohort study compared overall survival (OS) between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients with lymphoma in Denmark. Furthermore, differences in clinical and socioeconomic variables were compared, and mediators of OS differences were explored to explain possible outcome differences.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included a total of 540 non-Western patients and 16,294 Danish-born patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the period 2000-2020. Inverse probability weighting and mediation analysis using a natural effects Cox model were used to investigate the causal relationship between immigration status and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indirect effects mediated through differences in performance status and income indicated a trend towards inferior OS for non-Western immigrant patients with HRs of 1.06 (0.99-1.14) and 1.06 (0.99-1.14). However, no total causal effect of immigration status on OS was observed overall (HR: 0.94 [0.79-1.12]) and within subtype-specific analyses, except for classical Hodgkin lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in OS between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients were discovered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S484797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This nationwide Danish cohort study compared overall survival (OS) between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients with lymphoma in Denmark. Furthermore, differences in clinical and socioeconomic variables were compared, and mediators of OS differences were explored to explain possible outcome differences.
Patients and methods: The study included a total of 540 non-Western patients and 16,294 Danish-born patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the period 2000-2020. Inverse probability weighting and mediation analysis using a natural effects Cox model were used to investigate the causal relationship between immigration status and OS.
Results: Indirect effects mediated through differences in performance status and income indicated a trend towards inferior OS for non-Western immigrant patients with HRs of 1.06 (0.99-1.14) and 1.06 (0.99-1.14). However, no total causal effect of immigration status on OS was observed overall (HR: 0.94 [0.79-1.12]) and within subtype-specific analyses, except for classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
Conclusion: No significant differences in OS between non-Western immigrant patients and Danish-born patients were discovered.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews.
Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews.
When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes.
The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.