The 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-9) has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1177/02692155251315060
Daniel Nunes Morais, André Pontes-Silva, Felipe Souza Barreto, Jocassia Silva Pinheiro, Leonardo Antônio Santos de Oliveira, Daniela Bassi-Dibai, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Mariana Arias Avila, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho
{"title":"The 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-9) has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Daniel Nunes Morais, André Pontes-Silva, Felipe Souza Barreto, Jocassia Silva Pinheiro, Leonardo Antônio Santos de Oliveira, Daniela Bassi-Dibai, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Mariana Arias Avila, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho","doi":"10.1177/02692155251315060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo assess the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain.DesignQuestionnaire validation study.SettingStudy was conducted in an online environment.ParticipantsWe included people aged 18 to 50 years with self-reported low back pain lasting > three months and assessed the Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale and the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.Main measuresWe used intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and Cronbach's alpha to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. We tested correlations between the domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the other variables to assess construct validity.ResultsA total of 174 participants with chronic low back pain were included in the analysis. No ceiling or floor effect was found. In terms of construct validity, there was a positive correlation between the domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the other variables. In the reliability analysis, there was adequate test-retest reliability of the two domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, standard error of measurement = 3.4%, and minimum detectable change = 9.6% for the activity avoidance domain; and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, standard error of measurement = 3.5%, and minimum detectable change = 9.9% for the somatic focus domain. There was acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.68) for both domains.ConclusionThe 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251315060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain.DesignQuestionnaire validation study.SettingStudy was conducted in an online environment.ParticipantsWe included people aged 18 to 50 years with self-reported low back pain lasting > three months and assessed the Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale and the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.Main measuresWe used intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and Cronbach's alpha to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. We tested correlations between the domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the other variables to assess construct validity.ResultsA total of 174 participants with chronic low back pain were included in the analysis. No ceiling or floor effect was found. In terms of construct validity, there was a positive correlation between the domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the other variables. In the reliability analysis, there was adequate test-retest reliability of the two domains of the 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, standard error of measurement = 3.4%, and minimum detectable change = 9.6% for the activity avoidance domain; and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, standard error of measurement = 3.5%, and minimum detectable change = 9.9% for the somatic focus domain. There was acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.68) for both domains.ConclusionThe 9-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia has adequate measurement properties in patients with chronic low back pain.

由 9 个项目组成的坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK-9)对慢性腰背痛患者具有充分的测量特性。
目的:评价慢性腰痛患者运动恐惧症9项坦帕量表的重测信度、内部一致性和结构效度。设计:问卷验证研究。设置:研究在在线环境中进行。参与者:我们纳入了年龄在18到50岁之间,自我报告腰痛持续3个月的人,并评估了疼痛相关灾难思维量表和9项运动恐惧症坦帕量表。主要测量方法:采用类内相关系数、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化和Cronbach's alpha来评估9项运动恐惧症坦帕量表的信度和内部一致性。我们测试了9项运动恐惧症坦帕量表的域与其他变量之间的相关性,以评估结构效度。结果:共有174名慢性腰痛患者被纳入分析。没有发现天花板或地板效应。在构念效度方面,9项坦帕运动恐惧症量表的域与其他变量之间存在正相关。信度分析中,9项坦帕量表的两项测重信度均良好:活动回避项的类内相关系数= 0.99,测量标准误差= 3.4%,最小可检测变化= 9.6%;类内相关系数= 0.99,测量标准误差= 3.5%,最小可检测变化= 9.9%。两个领域的内部一致性均可接受(Cronbach's alpha≥0.68)。结论:坦帕9项运动恐惧症量表对慢性腰痛患者具有足够的测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信