Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer.
Finn Amundsen Dittberner, Morten Bendixen, Peter Bjørn Licht
{"title":"Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer.","authors":"Finn Amundsen Dittberner, Morten Bendixen, Peter Bjørn Licht","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously did a randomized clinical trial of lobectomy by VATS or thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer and found that patients who underwent VATS had less postoperative pain and better quality of life compared with thoracotomy. VATS has since been regarded the preferred surgical method for early-stage lung cancer. It is assumed that long-term survival is not influenced by surgical approach, but this assumption primarily rests on non-randomized comparative studies. We decided to do a long-term follow-up of patients who entered our previous randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2008 and 2014 we randomly assigned 206 patients to VATS (n = 103) or anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 103) for proven or suspected early-stage NSCLC. Records from patients with NSCLC on final pathology were identified in the national electronic patient-record system and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Overall, disease-free, and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare the two interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients had NSCLC on final histopathology. Four patients were lost to follow-up and the remaining 192 were included in this follow-up study with 128 events used for overall survival analysis, 100 events for disease-free survival analysis and 79 events for cancer-specific survival analysis. VATS was used in 99 patients versus 93 by thoracotomy. Median age at time of surgery was 66 years (range 41-85 years). After a median follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 9.9-15.8 years), 33% of patients were alive. Overall, disease-free, and cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between VATS and thoracotomy: Overall survival (p = 0.29), disease-free survival (p = 0.17) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall, disease-free, or cancer-specific survival between VATS and thoracotomy. However, larger trials with better power for survival analysis are needed to fully explore if there are differences. Alternatively, differences in survival between thoracotomy and VATS for early-stage NSCLC could be investigated by pooling survival data from two similar randomized trials that have since been published.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We previously did a randomized clinical trial of lobectomy by VATS or thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer and found that patients who underwent VATS had less postoperative pain and better quality of life compared with thoracotomy. VATS has since been regarded the preferred surgical method for early-stage lung cancer. It is assumed that long-term survival is not influenced by surgical approach, but this assumption primarily rests on non-randomized comparative studies. We decided to do a long-term follow-up of patients who entered our previous randomized trial.
Methods: Between 2008 and 2014 we randomly assigned 206 patients to VATS (n = 103) or anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 103) for proven or suspected early-stage NSCLC. Records from patients with NSCLC on final pathology were identified in the national electronic patient-record system and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. Overall, disease-free, and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare the two interventions.
Results: A total of 196 patients had NSCLC on final histopathology. Four patients were lost to follow-up and the remaining 192 were included in this follow-up study with 128 events used for overall survival analysis, 100 events for disease-free survival analysis and 79 events for cancer-specific survival analysis. VATS was used in 99 patients versus 93 by thoracotomy. Median age at time of surgery was 66 years (range 41-85 years). After a median follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 9.9-15.8 years), 33% of patients were alive. Overall, disease-free, and cancer-specific survival were not significantly different between VATS and thoracotomy: Overall survival (p = 0.29), disease-free survival (p = 0.17) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.31).
Conclusions: We did not find any statistically significant differences in overall, disease-free, or cancer-specific survival between VATS and thoracotomy. However, larger trials with better power for survival analysis are needed to fully explore if there are differences. Alternatively, differences in survival between thoracotomy and VATS for early-stage NSCLC could be investigated by pooling survival data from two similar randomized trials that have since been published.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.