Different forms of stigma and rural primary care professionals' willingness to prescribe buprenorphine

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Berkeley Franz , Lindsay Y. Dhanani , Sean Bogart , Cheyenne Fenstemaker , William C. Miller , O. Trent Hall , Daniel Brook , Vivian Go
{"title":"Different forms of stigma and rural primary care professionals' willingness to prescribe buprenorphine","authors":"Berkeley Franz ,&nbsp;Lindsay Y. Dhanani ,&nbsp;Sean Bogart ,&nbsp;Cheyenne Fenstemaker ,&nbsp;William C. Miller ,&nbsp;O. Trent Hall ,&nbsp;Daniel Brook ,&nbsp;Vivian Go","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective but substantially under prescribed in the rural United States. Among the most cited barriers to buprenorphine prescribing is stigma, yet little progress has been made in developing successful strategies to reduce stigma and increase access to life-saving medication. One of the key challenges to developing successful implementation strategies is understanding the different types of stigma that limit implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study draws from qualitative interviews with 23 primary care professionals (PCPs) in rural Ohio. We conducted semi-structured interviews focused on prior experiences with buprenorphine, willingness to prescribe it, prior buprenorphine training, and barriers to prescribing. Thematic analysis resulted in 3 forms of stigma that must be addressed to improve implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PCPs discussed 3 key forms of stigma that limit buprenorphine prescribing in rural areas: 1) stigma towards patients—PCPs feared being harmed by patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) if they began prescribing buprenorphine; 2) stigma towards providers—PCPs believed their clinics would be stigmatized if they began treating addiction; and 3) stigma towards buprenorphine—PCPs worried they might unintentionally harm patients through prescribing a partial opioid agonist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stigma remains a critical barrier to buprenorphine prescribing among rural PCPs but is not limited to negative attitudes towards people with OUD. Buprenorphine is also stigmatized and PCPs fear becoming stigmatized if they prescribe the medication. Implementation research is urgently needed to test whether multicomponent stigma-reduction strategies increase access to buprenorphine in rural communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 209633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are highly effective but substantially under prescribed in the rural United States. Among the most cited barriers to buprenorphine prescribing is stigma, yet little progress has been made in developing successful strategies to reduce stigma and increase access to life-saving medication. One of the key challenges to developing successful implementation strategies is understanding the different types of stigma that limit implementation.

Methods

This study draws from qualitative interviews with 23 primary care professionals (PCPs) in rural Ohio. We conducted semi-structured interviews focused on prior experiences with buprenorphine, willingness to prescribe it, prior buprenorphine training, and barriers to prescribing. Thematic analysis resulted in 3 forms of stigma that must be addressed to improve implementation.

Results

PCPs discussed 3 key forms of stigma that limit buprenorphine prescribing in rural areas: 1) stigma towards patients—PCPs feared being harmed by patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) if they began prescribing buprenorphine; 2) stigma towards providers—PCPs believed their clinics would be stigmatized if they began treating addiction; and 3) stigma towards buprenorphine—PCPs worried they might unintentionally harm patients through prescribing a partial opioid agonist.

Conclusions

Stigma remains a critical barrier to buprenorphine prescribing among rural PCPs but is not limited to negative attitudes towards people with OUD. Buprenorphine is also stigmatized and PCPs fear becoming stigmatized if they prescribe the medication. Implementation research is urgently needed to test whether multicomponent stigma-reduction strategies increase access to buprenorphine in rural communities.
不同形式的污名化与农村初级保健专业人员开具丁丙诺啡处方的意愿。
简介:丁丙诺啡和其他药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)非常有效,但在美国农村基本上没有规定。丁丙诺啡处方中最常提到的障碍之一是耻辱感,但在制定减少耻辱感和增加获得救命药物的成功战略方面进展甚微。制定成功实施战略的关键挑战之一是了解限制实施的不同类型的污名。方法:本研究对俄亥俄州农村地区的23名初级保健专业人员(pcp)进行了定性访谈。我们进行了半结构化的访谈,重点是以前使用丁丙诺啡的经历,开丁丙诺啡的意愿,之前的丁丙诺啡培训以及开处方的障碍。专题分析得出了必须解决的三种污名化形式,以改进实施工作。结果:pcp讨论了限制农村丁丙诺啡处方的3种主要的耻辱感形式:1)对患者的耻辱感——pcp担心如果开始开丁丙诺啡,会受到阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的伤害;2)对提供者的耻辱感——pcp认为如果他们开始治疗成瘾,他们的诊所将会受到耻辱感;3)对丁丙诺啡- pcp的歧视,担心他们可能会通过开具部分阿片类药物激动剂无意中伤害患者。结论:耻辱感仍然是农村pcp开具丁丙诺啡处方的关键障碍,但不限于对OUD患者的负面态度。丁丙诺啡也被污名化,而pcp担心如果他们开这种药会被污名化。迫切需要实施研究,以测试多组分减少耻辱策略是否能增加农村社区获得丁丙诺啡的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信