Impact of molecular diagnostic techniques on the acute respiratory infection sentinel surveillance program, Antioquia, Colombia, 2022.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2024.1519378
María Angélica Maya, Celeny Ortiz, Francisco Averhoff, Mabel Carabali, Laura S Pérez-Restrepo, Karl Ciuoderis-Aponte, Ana Isabel Davila, Diego Bastidas, Seti Buitrago, Gavin A Cloherty, Michael G Berg, Alan Landy, Juan P Hernandez-Ortiz, Paulina A Rebolledo, Jorge E Osorio
{"title":"Impact of molecular diagnostic techniques on the acute respiratory infection sentinel surveillance program, Antioquia, Colombia, 2022.","authors":"María Angélica Maya, Celeny Ortiz, Francisco Averhoff, Mabel Carabali, Laura S Pérez-Restrepo, Karl Ciuoderis-Aponte, Ana Isabel Davila, Diego Bastidas, Seti Buitrago, Gavin A Cloherty, Michael G Berg, Alan Landy, Juan P Hernandez-Ortiz, Paulina A Rebolledo, Jorge E Osorio","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2024.1519378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Surveillance of acute respiratory infection (ARI) informs vaccination, preventive, and management decisions. In many countries, immunofluorescence is the cornerstone for ARI surveillance. We aimed to determine the effect of adding multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) to conventional surveillance in ARI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respiratory samples from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) were tested by a conventional approach [direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and SARS-CoV-2 PCR, and a subset of samples underwent routine testing]. Negative specimens were tested by multiplex PCR (mPCR), and remain negative samples were sequenced. Descriptive, multivariable regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between March and June 2022, 299 patients were enrolled. Pathogens were detected in 43.8% of samples (131/299) tested by the conventional approach. Of the 168 negatives after the conventional approach, 157 (93.4%) were positive by mPCR, increasing the detection rate to 96.3% (288/299). With the conventional approach, the most frequent pathogen was respiratory syncytial virus (50.3%, 66/131), whereas with mPCR it was <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> (37.5%, 63/168). mPCR significantly improved pathogen detection in ARI surveillance (Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios 4.22 95% IC 4.22-5.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding mPCR to respiratory surveillance conventionally based on DIF significantly enhanced virus and bacteria detection. mPCR should be considered for routine ARI surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1519378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2024.1519378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Surveillance of acute respiratory infection (ARI) informs vaccination, preventive, and management decisions. In many countries, immunofluorescence is the cornerstone for ARI surveillance. We aimed to determine the effect of adding multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) to conventional surveillance in ARI.

Methods: Respiratory samples from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) were tested by a conventional approach [direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and SARS-CoV-2 PCR, and a subset of samples underwent routine testing]. Negative specimens were tested by multiplex PCR (mPCR), and remain negative samples were sequenced. Descriptive, multivariable regression analyses were conducted.

Results: Between March and June 2022, 299 patients were enrolled. Pathogens were detected in 43.8% of samples (131/299) tested by the conventional approach. Of the 168 negatives after the conventional approach, 157 (93.4%) were positive by mPCR, increasing the detection rate to 96.3% (288/299). With the conventional approach, the most frequent pathogen was respiratory syncytial virus (50.3%, 66/131), whereas with mPCR it was Haemophilus influenzae (37.5%, 63/168). mPCR significantly improved pathogen detection in ARI surveillance (Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios 4.22 95% IC 4.22-5.85).

Conclusion: Adding mPCR to respiratory surveillance conventionally based on DIF significantly enhanced virus and bacteria detection. mPCR should be considered for routine ARI surveillance.

分子诊断技术对急性呼吸道感染哨点监测项目的影响,安蒂奥基亚,哥伦比亚,2022。
目的:急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的监测为疫苗接种、预防和管理决策提供信息。在许多国家,免疫荧光是急性呼吸道感染监测的基础。我们的目的是确定在ARI常规监测中加入多重聚合酶链反应(mPCR)的效果。方法:采用常规方法[直接免疫荧光法(DIF)和SARS-CoV-2 PCR法]对流感样疾病(ILI)和严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)患者的呼吸道样本进行检测,部分样本进行常规检测。阴性标本采用多重PCR (mPCR)检测,剩余阴性标本测序。进行了描述性、多变量回归分析。结果:在2022年3月至6月期间,299名患者入组。常规方法检出病原菌的比例为43.8%(131/299)。常规方法阴性168例,mPCR阳性157例(93.4%),检出率提高到96.3%(288/299)。常规方法中最常见的病原体是呼吸道合胞病毒(50.3%,66/131),而mPCR方法中最常见的病原体是流感嗜血杆菌(37.5%,63/168)。mPCR显著提高了ARI监测中的病原体检出率(调整发病率比4.22 95% ic4.22 -5.85)。结论:在常规的DIF呼吸监测中加入mPCR可显著提高病毒和细菌的检测。应考虑将mPCR用于急性呼吸道感染的常规监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信